Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Archer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$608kFood & Nutrition$319kHealth$224kRecreation & Sports$159kEducation$113kYouth Development$36kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
$300
Median grant
15
States reached
$269k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACIFIC CLINICS$35,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$35,000
YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY$25,000
YOUTH ON COURSE$20,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY$5,000
LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S FUND$1,500
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,000
CANCER CARE POINT$1,000
HOPE SERVICES$1,000
YU-AI KAI$500
FOOD BANK OF MONTEREY COUNTY$500
SAN JOSE BUDDHIST CHURCH$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$450
HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $655k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYSTOWN: $300 → 12%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 14%BOYSTOWN: $100 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $5k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $5k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $150 → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $5k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $500 → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $55 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $60k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $55k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $55k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $40k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $35k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $33k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $25k → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $23k → 8%YU-AI KAI: $500 → 8%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $25k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $60k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $48k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 8%PACIFIC CLINICS: $35k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $28k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $27k → 8%PACIFIC CLINICS: $10k → 8%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35 → 8%PACIFIC CLINICS: $35k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $18 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 49 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
19

Total granted

$1.4M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+35%

Still filing today

59%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +10%
  • PC
    PACIFIC CLINICS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $287k · revenue +239%
  • CC
    CANCER CAREPOINT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TW
    THERE WITH CARE
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • LA
    LEGAL AID OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIREDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +148%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
9
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
10
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Glaucoma Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $317,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSPECIAL OLYMPICS: $152,250 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICSSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $107,500 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITYNCGA FOUNDATION: $32,500 · OtherTHERE WITH CARE: $30,000 · Other+40 more: $58,987 · Other+40 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $350,196 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLE…PACIFIC CLINICS: $286,696 · Human ServicesPACIFIC CLINICS+6 more: $18,183 · Human ServicesCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $63,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,300 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,633 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,460 · HealthNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,150 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $4,150 · Health+10 more: $8,955 · HealthHOPE SERVICES: $6,750 · EmploymentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $3,650 · Youth DevelopmentHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $800 · AnimalsFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION: $500 · EducationALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Education
Other$698,737Human Services$655,075Health$103,148Employment$6,750Youth Development$3,650Animals$800Education$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $350,196 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $286,696 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $63,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSARATOGA FOOTHILL CLUB: $7,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $6,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,633 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,460 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $4,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $3,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SARATOGA LIBRARIES: $3,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,630 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,475 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,130 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOX: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $153 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CAREPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SARATOGA FOOTHILL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SARATOGA LIBRARIES ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE AUXILIARY FOR CHILDREN dba THRIFT BOX ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA18.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA · The Sharks Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Archer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Archer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Archer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Archer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Archer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph