· Private foundation
The Aprio Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k49 grants · $234k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Open Hand Atlanta | $10,000 |
| Our House | $10,000 |
| American Red Cross | $10,000 |
| Atlanta Victim Assistance | $10,000 |
| Sandy Springs Education Force | $10,000 |
| Next Generation Men & Women (NextGen) | $10,000 |
| Nana Grants | $10,000 |
| Bobby Dodd Institute | $10,000 |
| Blessings in a Backpack | $10,000 |
| City Harvest | $10,000 |
| Chattahoochee Nature Center (CNC) | $10,000 |
| Transformations by Atlanta Angels | $10,000 |
| Creating Connected Communities (CCC) | $10,000 |
| Robert W Woodruff Arts Center | $10,000 |
| North Fulton Community Charities (NFCC) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
52 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRON CLARK ACADEMY INC2× · 2019–2022 · $72k · revenue +81%
- OHOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC6× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +6%
- SHSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC5× · 2019–2025 · $43k · revenue +233%
Funded once
- FSFINAL SALUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +47%
- MCMary's Center for Maternal & Child (Mary's Center)one grant, 2024 · $8k
- MHMary Hall Freedom Village Incone grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…
Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.
Atlfamilymeal inc.'s mission is to feed, nourish and support hospitality workers and their families experiencing hunger and joblessness in the metro atlanta community.
To provide low-cost transitional living and life skill programs to pregnant mothers and new moms between the ages of 18 and 24
Families first strengthens family resiliency so children and families can thrive. through a prevention-based, two-generation approach, the organization provides behavioral health services, intensive navigation and case management, and…
Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.
The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society.
Creative community services (ccs) improves the quality of life for children teens and adults with developmental disabilities and mental health needs, and their families, by providing direct services and community-based support throughout…
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sandy Springs Education Force Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RON CLARK ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds SANDY SPRINGS EDUCATION FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds CREATING CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Transformations By Atlanta Angels ↗
- Who funds NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Victim Assistance Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT GENERATION MEN & WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds C5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE HERON NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WESTERN NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SHARE Charlotte ↗
- Who funds Living Bridges Ministry ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY REACH OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds Families Forward Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CocoKids Inc ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX PASS INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · John H & Wilhelmina D Harland Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Aprio Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northeast Arc Inc — 73% of income from government
- Diabetes Foundation Inc — 31% of income from government
- The Arc of Bergen and Passaic Counties Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.