Skip to content
The Anne Jeffrey Wright Family Foundation Dated 10/30/18 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Anne Jeffrey Wright Family Foundation Dated 10/30/18

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$106kFood & Nutrition$88kHealth$44kArts & Culture$20kPhilanthropy$1kEnvironment$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHESDA PROJECT$13,000
SHARE FOOD PROGRAM$13,000
FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA$13,000
PHILABUNDANCE$13,000
LUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE$13,000
SAVAGE SISTERS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA: $13k → 7%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $8k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $5k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $15k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $8k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%SAVAGE SISTERS: $15k → 22%SAVAGE SISTERS: $13k → 22%SAVAGE SISTERS: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 12 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$316k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+52%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SAVAGE SISTERS RECOVERY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +52%
  • SF
    SHARE FOOD PROGRAM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $26k · revenue +26%
  • TL
    THE LENFEST INSTITUTE FOR JOURNALISM SPECIAL ASSET FUND OF TPF
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • PT
    PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +52%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $750 · revenue +3%
  • T
    THRIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
4
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
5
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 143 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
8
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
9
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
10
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.

Food & Nutrition
11
Rolling Harvest Food Rescue

Mission statement: our goal is to increase access to donated fresh produce and other healthy foods to area hunger-relief sites that serve the at-risk, food-insecure population by providing local farmers and food producers with free,…

—
12
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Savage Sisters Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Philabundance: $56,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $26,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE FOOD PROGRAMCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,750 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC+1 more: $750 · Food & NutritionSAVAGE SISTERS RECOVERY INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesSAVAGE SISTERS RECOVERY INCPROJECT HOME: $30,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA: $13,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PAMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $13,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KITCHENLUTHERAN SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $26,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SETTLEMENT…COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,500 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE H…Mid-Ohio Foodbank: $15,000 · OtherMid-Ohio Foodbank+2 more: $922 · OtherBETHESDA PROJECT: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterBETHESDA PROJEC…PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LENFEST INSTITUTE FOR JOURNALISM SPECIAL ASSET FUND OF TPF: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $750 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $15,500 · Health
Food & Nutrition$98,500Human Services$94,500Other$57,422Housing & Shelter$47,000Philanthropy$20,750Health$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhilabundance: $56,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA PROJECT: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAVAGE SISTERS RECOVERY INC: $38,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $30,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LENFEST INSTITUTE FOR JOURNALISM SPECIAL ASSET FUND OF TPF: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $15,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anne Jeffrey Wright Family Foundation Dated 10/30/18 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anne Jeffrey Wright Family Foundation Dated 10/30/18. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anne Jeffrey Wright Family Foundation Dated 10/30/18’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home