Skip to content
The Anne & Michael Weprin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Anne & Michael Weprin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$29kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$6kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCivil Rights$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$337k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$3,600
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC$1,800
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC$1,800
ANANDA MARGA UNIVERSAL RELIEF TEAM$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAPER FIG FOUNDATION INC: $750 → 17%FRIENDS OF SIVANANDA ASHRAM YOGA IN THE CARIBBEAN: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$60k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+63%

Still filing today

83%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +64%
  • Transgender Law Center
    2× · 2018–2019 · $800 · revenue +196%
  • P
    PFLAG
    2× · 2018–2022 · $750 · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SIVANANDA ASHRAM YOGA IN THE CARIBBEAN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -62%
  • N4
    NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue ×11
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
3
Fund for the Global Fund

To encourage individuals, corporations, foundations and donor governments to support the global fund, an international foundation focused on ending three of the world's most deadly infectious diseases.

Human Services
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $28,800 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $25,200 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INCCOCONUT GROVE CRISIS FOOD PANTRY: $2,750 · OtherCOCONUT GROV…LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC - METRO NY REGION: $2,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA & L…PFLAG: $750 · OtherPFLAGFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $500 · OtherFEEDING WEST…Transgender Law Center: $800 · OtherTransgender …ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND: $500 · OtherADVOCATES FO…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF U…+1 more: $250 · OtherFRIENDS OF SIVANANDA ASHRAM YOGA IN THE CARIBBEAN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPAPER FIG FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterThe Millwood Fire Company Number One Inc: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,200 · InternationalAnanda Marga Universal Relief Team Inc (AMURT): $500 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,800 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $500 · Health
Education$28,800Philanthropy$25,200Other$8,550Human Services$3,750Public Safety & Disaster$3,500International$2,700Health$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $28,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $25,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SIVANANDA ASHRAM YOGA IN THE CARIBBEAN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOCONUT GROVE CRISIS FOOD PANTRY: $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Millwood Fire Company Number One Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPFLAG: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnanda Marga Universal Relief Team Inc (AMURT): $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anne & Michael Weprin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anne & Michael Weprin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anne & Michael Weprin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home