Skip to content
The Anita Revers Charitable Foundation Anita R Evers Trustee at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Anita Revers Charitable Foundation Anita R Evers Trustee

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$12kInternational$3kHuman Services$2kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$1kFood & Nutrition$500Public Safety & Disaster$250Environment$250Other$0
02FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE V FOUNDATION INC$500
OXFAM-AMERICA INC$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$300
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$254
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS: $500 → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $650 → 14%FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $100 → 16%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5k · 7 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$5k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+60%

Still filing today

86%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $554 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +111%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $850 · revenue +53%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $750 · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • GM
    GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER FOR GI CANCER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +31%
  • MA
    Musical Associates of Central New Yorkgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $750 · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
3
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
4
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
5
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
9
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
10
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
11
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dewitt Fire Dept Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER FOR GI CANCER: $10,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER FOR GI CANCERPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORORATION: $600 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES OF CNY: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · Other+7 more: $1,479 · Other+7 moreFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATION…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $750 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…Save The Children Federation Inc: $700 · InternationalSave The Children…+1 more: $100 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC: $850 · Human ServicesCLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS INC: $500 · Human ServicesFreedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $100 · Human ServicesTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $250 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100 · HealthMusical Associates of Central New York: $750 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $750 · Crime & LegalINTERRELIGIOUS FOOD CONSORTIUM: $500 · Education
Other$13,079International$3,300Human Services$1,450Health$1,350Arts & Culture$1,050Crime & Legal$750Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMERA CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anita Revers Charitable Foundation Anita R Evers Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anita Revers Charitable Foundation Anita R Evers Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anita Revers Charitable Foundation Anita R Evers Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home