How much did THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER grant in FY2024?

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER reported 13 grants totaling $4,254,624 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER based?

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER is based in NY.

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER

To operate an institute for veterinary education and specialty care, (cont'd on schedule o) clinical research and charity care for companion animals in new york city.

$4.3M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$578k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

profitshelters

2019

profit

2020

profit

2021

casesactivitiesnycsufferingrescue dogsprofitfoster

2022

waldo'slives dogsfostersheltersdedicated

2023

safepermanentprofitlovingdedicatedfoster

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $48k
$10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$50k–250k2 grants · $119k
$250k+1 grant · $578k

$10,675

Median grant

States reached

$226M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT$578,424
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$60,368
ASPCA$58,198
LITTLE WANDERERS NYC$40,578
AIR TWIGA ANIMAL RESCUE$15,440
MUDDY PAWS RESCUE$12,712
ADOPT A BOXER RESCUE$10,675
MR BONES & COMPANY INC$9,193
MEOW PARLOUR CATS INC$9,048
RESCUE CITY$8,042
BROOKLYN ANIMAL ACTION$7,671
CARSON CATS RESCUE$7,331
WAGGYTAIL RESCUE$6,988

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 88% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.9M · 21 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.9M

$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%

+55%

Still filing today

71%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE
8× · 2017–2024 · $333k · revenue +18%
TA
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
8× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +80%
LW
LITTLE WANDERERS NYC INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $229k · revenue +854%

Funded once

AH
ANIMAL HAVENgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +95%
AC
ANJELLICLE CAT RESCUEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +292%
AA
ABANDONED ANGELS COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE INC
one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Pet Rescue Miami Inc

Animals

Snuggle Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals

Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Aminal Rescue

Animals

Barkin Dogs Rescue Inc

Animal rescue

Animals

Jl Animal Rescue Inc

Animals

Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals

A Forever Home Animal Rescue Inc

We rescue abandoned, injured, abused dogs from high kill shelters, strays and owner surrenders. They are given medical treatments, socialized and made ready for adoption to their forever home. We have rescued thousands in the 12 years…

Animals

Runaways Animal Rescue

Animals

Donna's Love Pet Rescue

Animals

Adopt a Rescued Pet Inc

Rescue dogs & cats that have been abandoned and help overcrowed animal shelters

Animals

One Love Dog Rescue Inc

Rescue abandoned dogs from out of nys

Animals

Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rescue Dogs Rock Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bideawee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 15. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/31

the rest of the field

5,024/53,180

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/27

Grantees still filing

19/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,436,919Animals$1,471,213Philanthropy$57,421Recreation & Sports$5,067

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY19.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · All About Spay Neuter Inc · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CARING ABOUT THE STRAYS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 205753396 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CARING ABOUT THE STRAYS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 49% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Animal Medical Center?

Find your warmest path to The Animal Medical Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Animal Medical Center?

More from the funding graph

THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Animal Medical Center?

More from the funding graph