Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Andre & Elizabeth Kertesz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.6MEducation$55kCivil Rights$35kHuman Services$15kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $204k
$26,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK$154,000
CITY LORE$50,000
THE MORGAN LIBRARY & MUSEUM$43,000
BROOKLYN MUSEUM$26,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$5,000
PHOTO LEGACY PROJECT$5,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFE HORIZON: $3k → 17%SAFE HORIZON: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$652k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$1.1M
$574k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+17%

Still filing today

73%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CITY LORE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $160k · revenue +48%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $159k · revenue +6%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $126k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO FOR 2022
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • CL
    CITY LORE FOR 2022
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • VM
    VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOR 2023
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Berggruen Institute
Education
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
6
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
7
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
11
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture
12
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences; the most unlike its peers is Pine Hill Community Center Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $180,500 · OtherVIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTSPER SCHEDULE ATTACHED: $116,504 · OtherPER SCHEDULE ATTACHEDIndividual grant recipient: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO FOR 2022: $60,000 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO FOR 2022CITY LORE FOR 2022: $60,000 · OtherCITY LORE FOR 2022VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOR 2023: $50,000 · OtherVIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS FOR 2022: $50,000 · OtherTHE PHOTO REVIEW FOR 2022: $45,266 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO FOR 2023: $40,000 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELAT: $35,000 · Other+12 more: $260,250 · Other+12 moreCITY LORE INC: $160,000 · Arts & CultureCITY LORE INCMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $159,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORKWNET: $150,000 · Arts & CultureWNETINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $35,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHYPHOTO LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $29,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of Art: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $21,664 · Arts & CultureTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $125,500 · EducationTHE ART IN…The Pierpont Morgan Library: $43,000 · EducationThe Pierpo…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationPINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsSAFE HORIZON INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$982,520Arts & Culture$609,664Education$171,000Recreation & Sports$15,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY LORE INC: $160,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $159,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWNET: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $125,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $43,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHOTO LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 63% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $29,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD: $15,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetUnited Photo Industries Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,664 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY LORE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY ↗
  • Who funds PHOTO LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
  • Who funds PINE HILL COMMUNITY CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds United Photo Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Andre & Elizabeth Kertesz Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Andre & Elizabeth Kertesz Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andre & Elizabeth Kertesz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph