Skip to content
The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$193kEducation$91kHousing & Shelter$80kCrime & Legal$69kHealth$54kInternational$35kYouth Development$28kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $103k
$7,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$841k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE$20,000
SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS$12,000
SECRET SANTA PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUAL$11,429
CARDIO START INTERNATIONAL$10,000
SOUTHERN VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY$10,000
ROANOKE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
SAINT FRANCIS HOME$10,000
BRADLEY FREE CLINIC$10,000
AID FOR INDIVIDUALS BELOW THE FEDER$7,800
SML GOOD NEIGHBORS$6,000
HANDS TO LOVE$5,750
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN$1,000
RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $6k → 8%UNBRIDLED CHANGE: $1k → 13%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $6k → 8%UNBRIDLED CHANGE: $1k → 13%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $6k → 8%UNBRIDLED CHANGE: $1k → 13%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $2k → 20%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $5k → 8%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $1k → 20%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $20k → 8%SML GOOD NEIGHBORS: $5k → 8%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $1k → 20%CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES: $1k → 8%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $1k → 20%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $1k → 20%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $12k → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $12k → 8%SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$518k · 18 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$518k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+88%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +400% · 68% of their budget
  • AL
    ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +54%
  • CI
    CARDIOSTART INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SF
    SERENITY FUNERAL HOME
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • OP
    Oasis Productionsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +251%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom Ride Rescue

Freedom ride rescue is committed to saving dogs from overcrowded shelters and placing them in loving foster homes until they find their forever families. our mission is to create a no-kill state by rehabilitating and rehoming dogs while…

Animals
2
Liberty Humane Society Inc

We aim to improve animal welfare and reduce pet homelessness by providing affordable spay neuter services and wellness care enabling a better future for pets their families and all people who love them.

Animals
3
Live Free Animal Rescue

To rescue abandoned, neglected and traumatized animals and find these animals their furever homes.

Animals
4
Upper Valley Humane Society Inc

UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.

Animals
5
Angel View Inc

For decades, Angel View's mission has been helping children and adults with disabilities reach their maximum potential. Our clients have acquired head injuries, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, intellectual disabilities, neuromuscular diseases,…

Human Services
6
Upper Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

UVHFHs mission is to build affordable, durable,safe, healthy, economical,and energy-efficient homes; strenghthen & enrich communities; & long-term hope, prosperity, health & the lives of families & individuals in the Upper Valley of VT &…

—
7
Saint Frances Animal Center

Our mission is to provide a safe and nuturing environment for abandoned and mistreated dogs and cats until they can be placed in loving homes.

Animals
8
Francis House Inc

To provide a home and an extended family to persons with terminal illnesses so they can die with dignity surrounded by the unconditional love of god. we will use our lived experience as a resource for others.

Human Services
9
St Gerard House

Our Mission is to help individuals with autism and their families experience more joy and achieve meaningful life outcomes by providing evidence-based therapies, innovative programs and continuous advocacy.

Education
10
Franklin County Humane Society

Franklin County Humane Society dba Franklin County Animal Rescue (FCAR)promotes the health, welfare, and humane treatment of animal in Northwestern Vermont and provides temporary shelter for them with the goal of finding them good,…

Animals
11
Richmond County Hospice Inc

Mission is to comfort the body and heal the heart through compassionate quality care during end-of-life experiences, so patients and families may live each day with peace, comfort and dignity. we also serve the community by providing…

Human Services
12
Crossroads House

To provide a comfort care home for the residents of genesee county and wyoming county.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstones Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alice Lloyd College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $80,000 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCSOUTHERN VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACY: $65,000 · OtherSOUTHERN VIRGINIA CHILD ADVOCACYAID FOR INDIVIDUALS BELOW THE FEDER: $62,085 · OtherAID FOR INDIVIDUALS BELOW THE FEDERSECRET SANTA PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUAL: $45,971 · OtherSECRET SANTA PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $20,000 · OtherBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN: $12,000 · Other+8 more: $35,910 · Other+8 moreSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $56,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS SERVIC…SML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesSML GOOD NEIGHBORS I…THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE MISSION O…+4 more: $10,000 · Human Services+4 moreALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationALICE LLOYD …CARDIOSTART INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCONGENITAL HAND CAMP INC: $17,250 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $1,000 · HealthOasis Productions: $1,500 · ReligionAssisi Animal Clinics Of Virginia Inc: $1,000 · Animals
Other$335,966Human Services$100,000Education$60,000Philanthropy$40,000Health$18,250Religion$1,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $80,000 over 4y, 68% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS: $56,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCARDIOSTART INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC: $28,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGENITAL HAND CAMP INC: $17,250 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Freedom Farm Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNBRIDLED CHANGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAlices Kids Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOasis Productions: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssisi Animal Clinics Of Virginia Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds CARDIOSTART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SML GOOD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGENITAL HAND CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds New Freedom Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNBRIDLED CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds Alices Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds Oasis Productions ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Assisi Animal Clinics Of Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Mw Armistead III Fami…Robertson Family Foun…Elbert H Evelyn J & K…Edgar a Thurman Fdn C…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Ayco Charitable F…Verizon FoundationVanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …
Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Mw Armistead III Family Foundation · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Elbert H Evelyn J & Karen H Waldron Charitable Foundation · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Amy Elizabeth Lauth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amy Elizabeth Lauth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home