Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Almeida Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$342kHealth$54kHuman Services$21kEducation$20kHousing & Shelter$6kRecreation & Sports$3kPhilanthropy$1kEmployment$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL HOSPICE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOUTH EAST CONSORTIUM: $2k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
NY
OR
IN
PA
CT
CO
MO
KY
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$674k · 8 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$674k
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+2%

Still filing today

25%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $449k
  • CA
    CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $150k
  • SS
    SRCC SOCIETY FOR REHAB OF CRIPPLES
    5× · 2017–2022 · $50k

Funded once

  • SC
    STLUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • DJ
    DHARMA JYOTHI CHARITABLE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • SP
    ST PAUL PARISH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
School in the Square Public Charter School

School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…

Education
6
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
7
Reach Prep Inc

Provide transformative educational experiences that empower underserved students

Education
8
Charter School for Applied Technologies

The charter school for applied technologies prepares students to attain family sustaining careers by integrating career exploration and a life long learning culture.

Education
9
The Gateway School of New York

The gateway school is a k-8, independent day school that transforms the lives of bright students with language-based learning disabilities and attention deficits. at gateway, our students become skilled, strategic learners and confident…

Education
10
Westchester Secondary Charter School

Westchester secondary charter school will provide students in grades 6-12 with a challenging and comprehensive college preparatory education in a public school setting employing the technology of the 21st century. we will inspire students…

—
11
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
12
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Streetwise Partners Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $448,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY: $149,790 · OtherCATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEYSTLUKE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherSTLUKE CATHOLIC CHURCHSRCC SOCIETY FOR REHAB OF CRIPPLES: $50,000 · OtherSRCC SOCIETY FOR REHAB OF CRIPPLESDHARMA JYOTHI CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $31,602 · Other+12 more: $84,050 · Other+12 moreLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationAMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationMAROON AND WHITE INC: $1,000 · EducationLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH EAST CONSORTIUM: $1,505 · Human ServicesREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 · HealthSTREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $500 · Employment
Other$864,332Education$21,000Housing & Shelter$6,000Human Services$2,505Health$2,500Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH EAST CONSORTIUM: $1,505 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH EAST CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds MAROON AND WHITE INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETWISE PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Almeida Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Almeida Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc: 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Almeida’s filings →

More from the funding graph