Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Allen and Mimi Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$129kHuman Services$37kAnimals$18kReligion$12kYouth Development$9kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$4kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$3,500
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$3,500
CHRIST THE KING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC$3,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - DOTY SOCIETY$2,000
MISSION AGAPE$1,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PERMIAN BASIN$1,500
REFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP$1,040
ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$1,000
THE CHRISTI CENTER$1,000
SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $5k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $4k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $3k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $3k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $3k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $3k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 12 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$188k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +149%
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST
    6× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +160%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • OM
    OXFORD MONTESSORI SCHOOLS LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • BS
    BYNUM SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - MOODY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas

To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
3
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
4
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
7
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
8
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
9
Texas Future Farmers of America Foundation Inc

Building on the proven success of texas agriculture education and the texas ffa program, our mission is distinguished by the continued development, funding, and implementation of cutting edge learning opportunities focusing on academic…

Food & Nutrition
10
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
11
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
12
Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in texas; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in texas without regard to race,…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Agape; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF AUSTIN: $104,500 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF AUSTINUT MOODY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION: $7,500 · OtherOXFORD MONTESSORI SCHOOLS LTD: $6,148 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - DOTY SOCIETY: $5,600 · Other+24 more: $37,575 · Other+24 moreFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $18,500 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANG…DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN …HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $14,550 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyBORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17,500 · AnimalsCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,000 · Food & NutritionMISSION AGAPE: $1,500 · Food & NutritionBoys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $250 · Youth DevelopmentBYNUM SCHOOL: $2,500 · EducationAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $1,000 · EducationEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $500 · Education
Other$161,323Human Services$21,000Philanthropy$17,550Animals$17,500Food & Nutrition$4,500Youth Development$4,250Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $14,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $3,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTI CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS AUSTIN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MISSION AGAPE ↗
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN EXPLORE INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Junior League of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS AUSTIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Allen and Mimi Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Allen and Mimi Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Allen and Mimi Smith Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Allen and Mimi Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allen and Mimi Smith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph