Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alexiana C and Steven D Wladis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$89kHuman Services$61kReligion$46kPhilanthropy$22kYouth Development$14kArts & Culture$11kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$292k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANILUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL$38,500
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM$20,361
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE$16,000
GOOD LIFE YOUTH FOUNDATION$6,000
3GNY$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK$3,000
SYRACUSE COMMUNITY HEBREW SCHOOL$3,000
EVERSON MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF BOSTON$1,800
YOUTH ENRICHMENT OUTREACH PROGRAM$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN ONONDAGA COUNTY$1,000
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER$1,000
MENORAH PARK$450
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $16k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $15k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $10k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $10k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$228k · 7 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$228k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MANLIUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $86k · revenue -5%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +45%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k

Funded once

  • YH
    York Hospital
    one grant, 2024 · $600 · revenue 0%
  • WH
    WLADIS HATS & GLOVE FOUNDAITON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • WH
    WLADIS HATS & GLOVE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
2
Jewish Home Lifecare

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

3
Mid-York Senior Homes Inc

Mid-york senior homes is a 72 unit housing complex that provides affordable housing to senior citizens.

4
Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services
5
Jewish Home of Central New York Inc

Jewish home's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. menorah park is committed to maintaining jewish values and traditions.

6
Syracuse Jewish Family Service Inc

As the human services arm of the jewish community, sjfs is dedicated to holistic, preventive, wellness-oriented integration of social and human services offered without regard to race or creed to all residents of central new york.

Human Services
7
Jewish Community Council of Erie

The Jewish Community Council of Erie is a community-based organization serving individuals and families in the Erie area with a wide range of social and educational services, as well as capacity-building support to other community-based…

Philanthropy
8
Springside At Seneca Hill Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc., the sole member of Springside at Seneca Hill, Inc., is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health
9
Jewish Home of Central New York Residential Living Inc

Jewish home of central new york residential living's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home is committed to maintaining…

Human Services
10
Jewish Community Center of Schenectady Inc

Our mission is to build a vibrant, welcoming, and inclusive community that embraces our jewish values, culture, identity and connections to israel, engages the local community, and enhances the body, mind and spirit of our members.

Religion
11
Camp Solomon Schechter

Camp Solomon Schechter blends Jewish tradition and culture as the foundation of the camp experience; integrates nature and activity to create fun; and embraces the child in every person to foster joy, facilitate friendship, and create…

Recreation & Sports
12
Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of Syracuse Inc and the most unlike its peers is Menorah Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MANLIUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL INC — $86,000 · EducationMANLIUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL INCGOOD LIFE PHILANTHROPIC YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · EducationGOOD LIFE PHILANTHROPIC YOUTH FOUNDATIO…CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM — $45,283 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM3GNY — $16,000 · Other3GNYEVERSON MUSEUM OF ART — $10,000 · OtherEVERSON MUSEUM OF ARTSYRACUSE COMMUNITY HEBREW SCHOOL — $3,000 · Other+10 more — $6,750 · Other+10 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC — $61,118 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF…JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTH ENRICHMENT OUTREACH PROGRAM — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN ONONDAGA COUNTY INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionYork Hospital — $600 · Health
Education$92,000Other$81,033Human Services$61,118Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$7,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Health$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMANLIUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL INC — $86,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC — $61,118 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH ENRICHMENT OUTREACH PROGRAM — $7,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN ONONDAGA COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYork Hospital — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANLIUS PEBBLE HILL SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SYRACUSE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds YOUTH ENRICHMENT OUTREACH PROGRAM
  • Who funds GOOD LIFE PHILANTHROPIC YOUTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN ONONDAGA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds York Hospital
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alexiana C and Steven D Wladis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alexiana C and Steven D Wladis Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alexiana C and Steven D Wladis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph