Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alberto Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$123kPhilanthropy$83kReligion$58kHealth$54kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$4kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$765k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
RACHEL FOUNDATION$10,000
ST PHILOMENA CHURCH$8,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$2,500
CFBNJ$2,500
NEMOURS CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH$1,000
EMPLOYMENT HORIZONS$1,000
POAC AUTISM SERVICES$1,000
KESSLER FOUNDATION$1,000
CONVENANT HOUSE$500
GREATER NEWARK HOLIDAY FUND$500
ATHRITIS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%POAC AUTISM SERVICES: $1k → 11%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $1k → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $500 → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $250 → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $250 → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $250 → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $250 → 4%KESSLER FOUNDATION: $250 → 4%GOODWILL RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$316k · 18 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -74% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$316k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-74%

Still filing today

22%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +47%
  • RF
    RACHEL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +3% · 34% of their budget
  • KF
    Kessler Foundation Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • PB
    PIRATE BLUE ATHLETIC FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Jersey Health Foundation Inc

The Organization's mission is to support healthcare education, research and patient care programs in the State of New Jersey and for other scientific, charitable, literary and educational purposes.

Health
2
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
3
Healthcare Institute of New Jersey Inc

To provide advocacy, research, analysis, communication and publication of information concerning healthcare products, r & d, their manufacture and marketing as they pertain to new jersey's pharmaceutical and medical technology industry.

4
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

5
Goodwill Industries of Southern New Jersey & Philadelphia
Employment
6
Foundation for Hackettstown Medical Center

To serve the philanthropic needs for the Hackettstown Medical Center.

7
The New Jersey Institute for Social Justice Inc

New jersey institute for social justice (the institute), a public charity, is a newark-based urban research and advocacy organization dedicated to the advancement of new jersey's urban areas and residents.

Human Services
8
Autism New Jersey Inc

Autism New Jersey drives statewide change and creates connections through compassionate support, expert guidance, and a deep commitment to an autism-friendly New Jersey.

9
New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute Inc

The Organization's mission is to improve the safety, quality, and affordability of healthcare for everyone.

10
Newark Alliance Inc

To work in partnership to make newark a better, safer place to work, live, learn, play, and do business.

Philanthropy
11
Fund for New Jersey
12
Woods Foundation of New Jersey Inc

Support Woods Services of New Jersey, Woods Services, Inc. and other affiliates or related nonprofit organizations that are organized and operated to provide comprehensive lifecycle care management services for people with intellectual…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Employment Horizons Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rachel Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYST PHILOMENAS CHURCH — $48,000 · OtherST PHILOMENAS CHURCHST BARNABUS MEDICAL CTR — $45,000 · OtherST BARNABUS MEDICAL CTRSETON HALL PREP ANNUAL FUND — $30,000 · OtherSETON HALL PREP ANNUAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $12,500 · Other+20 more — $31,750 · Other+20 moreRACHEL FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · PhilanthropyRACHEL FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyKessler Foundation Inc — $2,750 · Human ServicesPARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesGoodwill Rescue Mission Inc — $250 · Human ServicesEMPLOYMENT HORIZONS INC — $1,000 · Employment
Other$262,250Philanthropy$82,500Human Services$4,000Employment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRACHEL FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 7y, 34% of budgetKessler Foundation Inc — $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREATER NEWARK HOLIDAY FUND — $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEMPLOYMENT HORIZONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGoodwill Rescue Mission Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RACHEL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Kessler Foundation Inc
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES
  • Who funds THE GREATER NEWARK HOLIDAY FUND
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT HORIZONS INC
  • Who funds Goodwill Rescue Mission Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alberto Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 54%
  • Employment Horizons Inc90% of income from government
  • Kessler Foundation Inc54% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Alberto Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Alberto Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph