Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aikman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$213kAnimals$60kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$46kFood & Nutrition$45kReligion$18kHousing & Shelter$17kEducation$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$37,500
ALL AMERICAN HORSE CHARITIES$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
COLEL CHABAD$7,500
CROWN HILL FOUNDATION$5,000
WHEELER MISSION$5,000
THE CARTER CENTER$5,000
FEEDING AMERICAWESTERN MI ALLIANCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WHEELER MISSION: $10k → 5%WHEELER MISSION: $5k → 5%WHEELER MISSION: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 14 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$437k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-14%

Still filing today

64%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $192k · revenue +39%
  • AA
    ALL AMERICAN HORSE CHARITIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +65%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SC
    SERVICENETFRANKLIN COUNTY MA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RC
    RILEY CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
2
Aca International

Aca international contributes to the success of its members, the positive reputation of the industry and the health of the economy. we accomplish this by 1) being the comprehensive, knowledge-based resource for the credit and collection…

—
3
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
American Angus Association

To provide programs, services, technology and leadership to enhance the genetics of the angus breed, broaden its influence within the beef industry and expand the market for superior tasting, high-quality angus beef worldwide.

—
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
8
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
American Association of Museums

Champion equitable and impactful museums by connecting people, fostering learning and community, and nurturing museum excellence.

Arts & Culture
11
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
12
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Olivet Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $192,250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $21,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCSALVATION ARMY: $31,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFEEDING AMERICAWESTERN MI ALLIANCE: $25,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICAWESTERN MI ALLIANCEGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $15,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCIU FOUNDATION JACOBS SCHOOL OF MUSI: $13,000 · OtherIU FOUNDATION JACOBS SCHOOL OF MUSICOLEL CHABAD: $12,500 · OtherCOLEL CHABADUniversity of Michigan: $11,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganSERVICENETFRANKLIN COUNTY MA: $10,000 · OtherSERVICENETFRANKLIN COUNTY MAIU FOUNDATIONJACOBS SCHOOL MUSIC: $6,000 · Other+7 more: $31,000 · Other+7 moreALL AMERICAN HORSE CHARITIES INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsALL AMERICAN H…INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COMPOSERS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL VIOLIN COMPETITION OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $7,750 · Arts & CultureAmerican Saddle Horse Museum Association Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $17,000 · Human Services
International$213,250Other$154,500Recreation & Sports$60,000Arts & Culture$37,750Human Services$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $192,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALL AMERICAN HORSE CHARITIES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $11,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL VIOLIN COMPETITION OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $7,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAmerican Saddle Horse Museum Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL AMERICAN HORSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL VIOLIN COMPETITION OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds OLIVET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Saddle Horse Museum Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aikman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aikman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Aikman Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Aikman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aikman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph