Loading…
· Public charity
THE AGRICULTURAL AND LABOR PROGRAM INC
The specific purpose for which this corporation is formed is to assist agricultural workers, disadvantaged, disenfranchised persons and other interested members of the community and their family members in cooperatively meeting their needs for better health, education, social services, home life, economic opportunities, and human…
$16M
Granted FY2023
11
Grants
1
Communities
$292k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of THE AGRICULTURAL AND LABOR PROGRAM INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
livingliheapcsbgeducationalchurchempower
2020
livingliheapcsbgeducationalempowerchurch
2021
livingliheapcsbgeducationalchurchempower
2022
liheapcsbg
2023
low incomeincome energyblock
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $521k
- $250k+1 grant · $292k
$34,560
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- GERTRUDE WALDEN CHILD CARE CENTER INC$291,693
- HOBE SOUND CHILD CARE CENTER INC$167,425
- THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC$126,482
- THE DUNBAR CENTER INC$116,791
- LOVING CARE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC$109,824
- IN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC$34,560
- BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE SUN COAST INC$18,400
- WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF FLORIDA INC$13,622
- PORT SALERNO CHURCH OF GOD INC$12,090
- MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES OF FORT PIERCE INC$11,340
- GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC$9,007
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $650k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 18 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
18
1
Total granted
$4.0M
$7k
Still filing today
61%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHOBE SOUND EARLY LEARNING CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $425k · revenue +224%
- LSLITTLE SCHOLARS CHILD DEV CENTER INC2× · 2021–2022 · $399k · revenue +120%
- ITIN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC6× · 2018–2023 · $230k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- NBNEW BETHEL AMEone grant, 2021 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Childrens Center
The children's center provides early child care and education in a vibrant learning community that emphasizes personal development, social relationships and family involvement, in order to establish a foundation for lifelong learning.
Education
2
The Children's Center of Western North Carolina
At The Childrens Center of Western North Carolina (TCC), we are dedicated to creating an inclusive, playful, and nuturing environment where children can grow and learn together in acceptance of one another.
Human Services
3
The Child Care Center Inc
In the child care center, children are loved, carefully cared for and valued. we make early learning experiences one of joy and success.
—
4
Dream Center of Lakeland Inc
A christian community center that serves to positively impact the lives of "at-risk" families
Education
5
Flagler Ecumenical
The mission of the Family Life Center is to provide compassionate support to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence through advocacy, crisis intervention, and community awareness.
—
6
Coulee Children's Center Inc
Coulee children's center, a provider of childcare services, proudly empowers families by focusing on healthy development and school readiness.
—
7
Women's Resource Center of Manatee Inc
Dedicated to improving and maintaining the quality of life for all women of manatee county
Human Services
8
Inman Christian Center
The mission is to empower the children, youth, families, & elderly to develop to their full physical, mental & spiritual potential within the communities that inman serves. inman provides childcare services, youth development activities &…
—
9
West Florida Foster Care Services
We are a Christ-centered non-profit foster care licensing agency dedicated to glorifying God by restoring the local body of Christ as the leader in serving those children in our community who have been abused, neglected, and abandoned.…
Religion
10
Hope Clubhouse of Southwest Fl Inc
Hope clubhouse's mission is to be a community of support for adults living with a mental illness which provides opportunities for paid employment and access to education, housing and wellness. the clubhouse philosophy believes in the…
Health
11
Wee Care Child Care Center Inc
Provide quality developmental child care and education to children of low to moderate income working parents.
—
12
The Mustard Seed of Central Florida
To provide support to persons as they re-establish a home after personal tragedy or natural disaster.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Independent Living and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters of the. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,426,763Education$691,501Human Services$650,290Health$229,680Youth Development$126,482Employment$62,252Housing & Shelter$16,860
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GERTRUDE WALDEN CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SCHOLARS CHILD DEV CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IN THE IMAGE OF CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE TREASURE COAST ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE DUNBAR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAKELAND INC ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES OF FORT PIERCE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING IN CENTRAL FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF FLORIDA FARMWORKERS ORGANIZATIONS ↗
- Who funds JESUS HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation -FL22.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - · United Way of Martin County Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach And · Loblolly Community Foundation Inc · Hobe Sound Community Chest Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE AGRICULTURAL AND LABOR PROGRAM INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Center for Independent Living — 65% of income from government
- Coalition of Florida Farmworker Organizations Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jesus House of Hope Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE DUNBAR CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 650216826 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE DUNBAR CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Agricultural and Labor Program Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Agricultural and Labor Program Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines