Skip to content

· Private foundation

The A & D Tom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$31kEducation$22kHuman Services$22kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$19kArts & Culture$14kCivil Rights$12kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$326k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BreakthroughSF$3,000
Live Oak School$2,000
SF Marin Food Bank$2,000
Golden Gate Christian Church$2,000
Community Music Center$1,500
Syracuse University$1,500
UC Berkeley Foundation$1,500
Asian Women's Shelter$1,250
Presbyterian Church$1,000
Community Initiatives$1,000
BAYCAT$1,000
Chinatown YMCA$1,000
Alzheimers Association$1,000
Habitat for Humanity Greater SF$1,000
CPMC Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Bridged Alliance: $1k → 17%Compass Family Services: $1k → 10%Self Help for the Elderly: $1k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $1k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $1k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $1k → 10%Gum Moon Women's Residence: $1k → 10%Gum Moon Women's Residence: $1k → 10%Gum Moon Women's Residence: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$143k · 28 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
21

Total granted

$143k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+6%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +68%
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +112%
  • CM
    COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • RT
    Ruth's Table CO Front Porch Communi
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • Chinese for Affirmative Action
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -60%
  • AW
    ASIAN WOMEN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
4
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
9
Legal Aid Association of California

The Legal Aid Association of California, the statewide membership of legal services nonprofits, serves its members through advocacy and other support in efforts to provide legal assistance to low-income Californians and ensure access to…

—
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
12
Alameda County Bar Association

To promote excellence in the legal profession and to facilitate equal access to justice.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Asian Theatre of the Sierra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Golden Gate Christian Church: $17,000 · OtherGolden Gate Christian ChurchCameron House: $10,200 · OtherCameron HouseChinatown YMCA: $8,500 · OtherChinatown YMCACPMC FOUNDATION (RAY DOLBY BRAIN HEALTH CENTER): $8,500 · OtherCPMC FOUNDATION (RAY DOLBY BRAIN HEALTH CENTER)BAYCAT: $7,500 · OtherBAYCATUC Berkeley Foundation: $7,084 · OtherUC Berkeley FoundationMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS: $6,750 · OtherMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWSIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $4,000 · Other+25 more: $37,500 · Other+25 moreCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,500 · HealthCALIFORNIA …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…+2 more: $750 · HealthCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $6,000 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureNoontime Concerts: $500 · Arts & CultureSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $3,167 · EducationSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $3,000 · EducationLIVE OAK A LEARNING CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · EducationLowell Alumni Association: $1,000 · EducationSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $4,000 · Human ServicesWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $1,000 · Human ServicesENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,500 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 · Crime & LegalAsian Law Caucus: $1,250 · Crime & Legal
Other$118,034Health$17,250Arts & Culture$9,500Education$9,167Human Services$8,500Environment$6,000Crime & Legal$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS: $6,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $3,167 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE OAK A LEARNING CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsian Law Caucus: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLowell Alumni Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Asian Theatre Of The Sierra: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoontime Concerts: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEI FONG AND ASSOCIATES AWS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHE-CAN GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
  • Who funds Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE OAK A LEARNING CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Asian Law Caucus ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE MEMORIAL CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tides Foundation · Metta Fund · McNabb Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The A & D Tom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The A & D Tom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A & D Tom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph