Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 54 Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$527k
Granted FY2024still arriving
99
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$170kReligion$152kPhilanthropy$143kFood & Nutrition$124kArts & Culture$112kHuman Services$101kRecreation & Sports$69kEmployment$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 99 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $215k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $234k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S DINING ROOM$78,000
UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
HAGGIN MUSEUM$25,000
DIOCESE OF STOCKTON$25,000
LODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$25,000
ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$25,000
OAK GROVE NATURE CENTER$23,880
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF STOCKTON$15,000
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY$10,000
SJCOE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
FAMILY RESOURCE AND REFERRAL CENTER$7,500
MANTECA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 12%MARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%MARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ARC SAN JOAQUIN: $1k → 12%UPLIFT ALL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%UPLIFT ALL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%ARC SAN JOAQUIN: $2k → 12%UPLIFT ALL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 84 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 81 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
24

Total granted

$1.0M
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

44%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $95k · revenue +120%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +587%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BM
    BISHOPS MINISTRY APPEAL
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • EP
    ENDEAVOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • SO
    SJC OFFICE OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Joaquin Partnership Inc

The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.

—
2
San Joaquin County Sheriffs Foundation

Support for local law enforcement

Crime & Legal
3
Stockton Harm Reduction Program Inc

The mission of shrp is to provide harm reduction services to people who use drugs and unhoused individuals in san joaquin county.

Health
4
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
5
San Jose Police Foundation

The San Jose Police Foundation is dedicated to preventing crime, saving lives and making our community a better and safer place to live and work by assisting the San Jose Police Department with resources not available from the city. We are…

Crime & Legal
6
Salinas Police Foundation

To provide community programs which support law enforcement and crime prevention needs for the community of SalinasTo provide training and equipment for the Police Department of the City of Salinas, California.

Crime & Legal
7
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
8
San Joaquin Pioneer & Historical Society

The mission of the museum is to inspire present and future generations to appreciate the fine arts and regional history by engaging our visitors' creative, social, and learning interests through exhibitions, programs, and events. this is…

—
9
Sacramento District Council St Vincent De Paul Society

A network of friends, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.

Human Services
10
Stanislaus Health Foundation

To provide medical education and support to the community of Stanislaus County through promotion of the 4 social determinants of health.

—
11
Family Promise of San Joaquin County

To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
12
San Joaquin Safety Council

San joaquin safety council, inc. is a community resource for health and safety information and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reinvent Stockton Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Joaquin County Bar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/49
Grantees still filing
26/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $95,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $57,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSJCOE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherBISHOPS MINISTRY APPEAL: $35,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY INC: $35,000 · OtherHAGGIN MUSEUM: $32,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY LODI: $30,500 · Other+96 more: $531,859 · Other+96 moreST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyST MARY'S HIGH…SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropySAN JOAQUIN CO…DOWNTOWN SPORTSMEN CLUB: $12,500 · PhilanthropyDOWNTOWN SPORT…LODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLODI POLICE FO…PIXIE WOODS INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyPIXIE WOODS IN…STOCKTON OLIVE OIL PROJECT CORPORATION: $8,500 · PhilanthropySTOCKTON OLIVE…SECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY: $6,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $4,250 · PhilanthropyST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $83,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF STOCKTON: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTULEBURG PRESS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Friends of the Fox: $7,300 · Arts & CultureSTOCKTON BLACK FAMILY DAY INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureMexican Heritage Center & Gallery Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY OF STOCKTON: $4,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE MANILA RISING: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSUPPORT STOCKTON POLICE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $6,700 · Human ServicesTHE UPLIFT ALL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Human ServicesHospice of San Joaquin: $5,000 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CA: $4,500 · Human ServicesARC-SAN JOAQUIN: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$852,359Philanthropy$155,250Food & Nutrition$83,500Arts & Culture$57,800Recreation & Sports$40,000Youth Development$25,000Human Services$24,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $95,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $83,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSUPPORT STOCKTON POLICE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF STOCKTON: $25,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetREINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN SPORTSMEN CLUB: $12,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetSTOCKTON FIRE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP STOCKTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $11,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetLODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetTULEBURG PRESS: $10,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPIXIE WOODS INC: $8,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetLODI HOUSE: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN OF PEACE: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTOCKTON OLIVE OIL PROJECT CORPORATION: $8,500 over 3y, 20% of budgetThe Friends of the Fox: $7,300 over 3y, 41% of budgetMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $6,700 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTOCKTON BLACK FAMILY DAY INC: $5,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE UPLIFT ALL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPREVAIL CA: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSan Joaquin Delta Community College Foundation: $4,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Association of University Women of the State of California Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMexican Heritage Center & Gallery Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY OF STOCKTON: $4,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCancer Kids of San Joaquin County Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PRESENTATION SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetDELTA RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Home of Stockton Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC-SAN JOAQUIN: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPort of Stockton Employee Association: $2,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetStockton Shelter For The Homeless: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFISHERY FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE MANILA RISING: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO WORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT STOCKTON POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF STOCKTON ↗
  • Who funds REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SPORTSMEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds STOCKTON FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP STOCKTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TULEBURG PRESS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PIXIE WOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds LODI HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA57.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc · Crete Family Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · Rosi Cerri Foundation Inc · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Henry and Carol Zeiter Charitable Foundation · Vaquero Foundation · The Foster Family Charitable Foundation · Coastal Barrier Island Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Teichert Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 54 Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 54 Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The 54 Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The 54 Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 54’s filings →

    More from the funding graph