Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The 2mary's Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Education$18kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCivil Rights$4kMembership Benefit$4kYouth Development$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$922
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MT LULA MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
GULPORT BRANCH OF NAACP$4,000
MSU FOUNDATION$3,500
THE IVY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FIRST MOUNT ZION BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALIVE INC: $2k → 9%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI: $2k → 23%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MS: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
VA
TN
DC
MS
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 39% of The 2mary's Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 16% of the giving stays in VA; read by stated purpose it is 9% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The 2mary's Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30k · 8 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$30k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+27%

Still filing today

63%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IVY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +81%
  • TF
    THISTLE FARMS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +117%
  • WG
    Women Giving Back Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +254%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION TYNER-FORD POST 213
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • DO
    DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • WC
    WITHERS COLLECTION MUSEUM & GALLERY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

2
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
3
Mel Johnson International

Food bank, community resource center

Philanthropy
4
Equitable Giving Circle

Through radical, no-strings-attached giving, EGC disrupts systemic inequality by funding community-led projects, including sustainable food security programs, housing support, and wellness initiatives

Philanthropy
5
Womens Way

Formed in the late-70's, WOMEN'S WAY achieves gender equity by building collective power to disrupt oppressive systems and strengthen alternative models centered in love, dignity, and liberation.

Human Services
6
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Mama Glow Foundation

The Foundation strives to improve maternal health outcomes in three primary ways. They are: Providing scholarships to aspiring doulas and midwives, Engaging in professional development pathways for our doulas, and Working with educational…

Human Services
8
Black Girls Cook

Black Girls Cook aims to empower and inspire inner-city adolescent Black girls through food security, culinary arts, urban farming, entrepreneurship, and STEM, emphasizing Black Diaspora cultural histories and food practices.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Giving Foundation Inc

The Giving Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit organization that serves individuals and families educational, emotional, and financial needs, by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of our donors.Our goal is to help by…

Human Services
10
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Arlington Food Assistance Center

To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
12
Women for Women International

In countries affected by conflict and war, women for women international (women for women) supports the most marginalized women to earn and save money, improve health and well-being, influence decisions in their home and community, and…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jackson State University Development Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GULPORT BRANCH OF NAACP — $7,000 · OtherGULPORT BRANCH OF NAACPMSU FOUNDATION — $6,500 · OtherMSU FOUNDATIONMT LULA MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherMT LULA MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCHAMERICAN LEGION TYNER-FORD POST 213 — $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION TYNER-FORD POST 213THISTLE FARMS INC — $3,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS — $2,000 · OtherWITHERS COLLECTION MUSEUM & GALLERY — $2,000 · OtherHER JUSTICE FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherWWI SCAA INC — $1,500 · OtherHELPING HANDS — $1,500 · Other+4 more — $2,600 · Other+4 moreJackson State University Development Foundation Inc — $6,000 · EducationJackson Sta…IVY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY — $4,500 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI — $3,000 · Human ServicesALIVE Inc — $1,500 · Human ServicesWomen Giving Back Inc — $2,450 · EmploymentMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $750 · Food & Nutrition
Other$39,100Education$6,000Community Improvement$4,500Human Services$4,500Employment$2,450Food & Nutrition$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJackson State University Development Foundation Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIVY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY — $4,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen Giving Back Inc — $2,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALIVE Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jackson State University Development Foundation Inc
  • Who funds IVY FOUNDATION OF GREATER PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC
  • Who funds Women Giving Back Inc
  • Who funds ALIVE Inc
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC
  • Who funds Feeding America

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The 2mary's Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The 2mary's Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The 2mary's Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph