Skip to content
Tgvzg18 Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tgvzg18 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$107kEducation$21kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$3kRecreation & Sports$696Employment$515Arts & Culture$219Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,716
Median grant
1
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES LESS THAN 5000$3,716
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Tzohar Seminary: $3k → 11%Chabad Woodland Hills: $3k → 14%Pevner: $3k → 13%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Tzohar Seminary: $2k → 11%Chabad woodland hills: $3k → 14%Beth Chana: $4k → 20%Cong Ani Maamin: $3k → 12%Tzohar Seminary: $2k → 11%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Tzohar Seminary: $2k → 11%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Tzohar Seminary: $2k → 11%Abudraham: $5k → 20%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Tzohar Seminary: $2k → 11%Alter Goldstein: $2k → 17%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Abudraham: $5k → 20%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%Congregation Ani Mamin: $3k → 12%cong Ani Maamin: $2k → 12%Cong Ani Maamin: $2k → 12%Cong Ani Maamin: $2k → 12%Cong Ani Maamin: $2k → 12%Bnos Chomesh - Congregation Ani Maamin: $14k → 20%Bnos Chomesh: $2k → 20%Bnos Chomesh: $2k → 20%Bnos Chomesh: $2k → 20%TADS TUITION AID TADS PMNT CHANIE TESSLER 2005291: $6k → 20%Oholei Torah: $11k → 20%Various Contributions Less Than 1500: $9k → 20%TADS TUITION AID TADS: $6k → 20%American Friends of Yeshiva Chabad Tzfat Inc: $5k → 20%MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES LESS THAN 5000: $4k → 20%Getzel Shul: $4k → 20%Dr PZC HAGSHAMA USDIR01371: $4k → 20%Getzel Shul: $3k → 20%Educational Institute: $2k → 20%Educational Institute: $2k → 20%Oholi Torah: $2k → 20%Oholi Torah: $2k → 20%Oholi Torah: $2k → 20%BAIS CHANA SEM MILAN 0458 NY: $2k → 20%Oholei Torah: $2k → 20%Oholei Torah: $2k → 20%Oholei Torah: $2k → 20%Oholei Menachem: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43k · 7 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
178

Total granted

$43k
$184k

Still filing today

0%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    Oholei Torah
    2× · 2019–2022 · $19k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF WOODLAND HILLS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2021 · $9k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • BC
    Bnos Chomesh - Congregation Ani Maamin
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • BC
    Beth Chana
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
11
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yagdil Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tzohar Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oholei Torah: $18,544 · OtherOholei TorahIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBnos Chomesh - Congregation Ani Maamin: $14,000 · OtherBnos Chomesh - Congregation Ani MaaminBeth Chana: $13,800 · OtherBeth ChanaIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherAbudraham: $9,500 · OtherVarious Contributions Less Than 1500: $9,395 · OtherCHABAD OF WOODLAND HILLS: $9,366 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,760 · Other+169 more: $101,136 · Other+169 moreTzohar Arts: $12,485 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA CHABAD TZFAT: $4,970 · Philanthropy+1 more: $125 · PhilanthropyUnited Talmidei Hakvutze Inc: $180 · ReligionYAGDIL TORAH INC: $54 · ReligionChayenu Inc: $50 · ReligionJEWISH GLOBAL NETWORK: $18 · ReligionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $27 · Health
Other$212,501Education$12,485Philanthropy$5,095Religion$302Health$27

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTzohar Arts: $12,485 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA CHABAD TZFAT: $4,970 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetUnited Talmidei Hakvutze Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAGDIL TORAH INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChayenu Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $27 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH GLOBAL NETWORK: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL INC: $10 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tzohar Arts ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA CHABAD TZFAT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nash Charity Foundati…Barber Family Foundat…Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…Amagil Foundation IncTGVZG FoundationThe Jacobson Foundati…Eom - Freund Family F…Lets Make It Happen N…The Rav-Noy Family Fo…The Ojc FundFidelity Investments …
Nash Charity Foundation IncNJ22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Barber Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Amagil Foundation Inc · TGVZG Foundation · The Jacobson Foundation · Eom - Freund Family Foundation · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tgvzg18 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tgvzg18 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tgvzg18 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tgvzg18 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tgvzg18’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home