How much did TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING grant in FY2024?

Housing & Shelter$2.2MHuman Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$881kFood & Nutrition$337kPublic Safety & Disaster$224kEmployment$171kHealth$136kPhilanthropy$100kCrime & Legal$70kOther$2.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

youth homelessness

2020

youth homelessness

2021

winter stormstorm critical

2022

supportive counselingcritical repairangel reachchildren youthsafety securityadultssolutions

2023

supportive counselinghealthempowercritical repaircyclepovertysingle

2024

educationdedicatedconstructionempoweringchallengeshopetransitioning

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k82 grants · $1.3M
$50k–250k2 grants · $178k

$13,000

Median grant

States reached

$491M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEXAS HOMELESS NETWORK$100,000
SGI VENTURES INC$78,373
JASPER-NEWTON LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP$40,000
FAMILY ELDERCARE$39,400
COMMUNITY OUTREACH HOUSING$35,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$27,400
AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER$27,400
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS$25,000
EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO$25,000
TRINITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
TEJANO CCC INC$25,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$25,000
MEALS ON WHEELS TARRANT COUNTY$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.3M · 82 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.3M

$734k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%

+5%

Still filing today

100%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS
2× · 2019–2020 · $355k · revenue +153%
MO
MEALS ON WHEELS CENTRAL TEXAS
5× · 2018–2022 · $287k · revenue +26%
LC
LEGACY CDC
6× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +845%

Funded once

ST
SOUTHEAST TEXAS EMERGENCY RELIEF
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -92%
SH
SETTEGAST HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NORTHEAST COMMUNITY
one grant, 2022 · $53k
EB
EDUCATION BASED HOUSINGgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +1178%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Houston County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love in action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—

Texas Low-Income Housing

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity Texas Inc

Habitat offices across texas rely on habitat for humanity texas to strenghten efforts to address the affordable housing crisis that face communities across the state. habitat texas does this by empowering them through technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter

Htx Hope Haven

We are moving people from crisis to lifelong self-sufficiency. We help the homeless and marginalized people in our community navigate through the services available to become self-supporting contributing members of our community.

Human Services

Affordable Homes of South Texas Inc

Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.

Housing & Shelter

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition leads the community solution to homelessness in greater Tarrant and Parker counties by serving as a catalyst for community transformation.

Human Services

Texas State Affordable Housing

Provide lower income texans with housing finance options.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity of Laredo Inc

Habitat for Humanity of Laredo Inc is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International Inc. A nondenominational Christian nonprofit organization. Our stated purpose is to create decent affordable housing for those in need and to make…

—

HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment

Habitat for Humanity of

The organization provides home ownership to responsible low-income families through new construction or renovation of existing housing stock.

Housing & Shelter

Hearts for Homes

The mission of Hearts for Homes is to improve the living conditions of low-income senior homeowners in Denton County. Hearts for Homes is a nonprofit Christian outreach providing hope and dignity through home rehabilitation, affording…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Garden State Consumer Credit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/125

the rest of the field

14%

11,293/80,567

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

116 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

114/116

Grantees still filing

87/116

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$2,249,407Human Services$2,026,117Other$2,493,549Community Improvement$881,250Food & Nutrition$337,000Public Safety & Disaster$223,500Employment$170,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community Partners IncMD46.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Isla Carroll Turner Friendship Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Moody Foundation · St David's Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson · Meadows Foundation Inc · Houston Endowment Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CDC OF FREEDMEN'S TOWN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +63% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 760265004 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CDC OF FREEDMEN'S TOWN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 69% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Texas State Affordable Housing?

Find your warmest path to Texas State Affordable Housing through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

116 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas State Affordable Housing?

More from the funding graph

TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

116 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas State Affordable Housing?

More from the funding graph