· Public charity
Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $217,150 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $252,420 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,270 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City of Arlington Parks & Recreation | $75,400 |
| Mission Metroplex Inc | $37,500 |
| Dental Health for Arlington | $37,500 |
| Arlington Chamber of Commerce | $21,750 |
| City of Grand Prairie | $20,000 |
| Arlington ISD Foundation | $15,000 |
| Friends of Levett Pavilion | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION6× · 2017–2023 · $875k · revenue +897%
- DHDENTAL HEALTH FOR ARLINGTON INC8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +28%
- MMMISSION METROPLEX INC6× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +168%
Funded once
- TCTARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTone grant, 2017 · $2.7M
- THTexas Health Resources Foundationone grant, 2021 · $82k · revenue -5%
- COCity of Grand Prairieone grant, 2017 · $32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
To promote and produce Public Art for the enjoyment of the community and for the economic benefit of the community.
Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.
The organization provides food and other supportive services to local residents in arlington, texas who are in need of assistance.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
The mission of Arlington Life Shelter is to promote self-sufficiency by providing shelter, employment programs and transitional services for North Texans impacted by homelessness.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.
Theatre arlington is dedicated to the cultural enrichment, education and entertainment of the citizenry of arlington, texas and the north texas community.
The mission of the organization is to create dynamic leaders by providing professional growth opportunities resulting on the overall improvement of healthcare in Texas. The organization intends to be the professional membership socieity…
To provide Medical and Dental Care to all patients in Dallas and its surrounding cities regardless of ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Area Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is International Corridor Vision. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tarrant County Indigent Care corporation ↗
- Who funds TARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DENTAL HEALTH FOR ARLINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION METROPLEX INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Levitt Pavilion - Arlington ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION OF THE ARLINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Texas EMS Trauma and Acute Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds International Corridor Vision ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital?
Find your warmest path to Texas Health Arlington Memorial Hospital through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.