How much did TEXAS FOR ALL grant in FY2024?

TEXAS FOR ALL reported 14 grants totaling $290,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

TEXAS FOR ALL

The organization is established for the purpose of supporting coordinated investments and strategies that advance the social welfare of underrepresented communities in texas with a particular focus on people of color, people with disabilities, women, young, queer and gender diverse, and working-class people.

$290k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$25k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of TEXAS FOR ALL’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

fair

2024

buildpowerorganizingissuesworkingcivic engagementhealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$487k

Total assets

Largest grants

BATTLEGROUND TEXAS ENGAGEMENT FUND$25,000
COMMUNITY LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE$25,000
ONE APIA TEXAS INC$25,000
MI FAMILIA VOTA$25,000
TEXAS AFT$25,000
MOVE TEXAS ACTION FUND$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD TEXAS VOTES$25,000
TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECTS$25,000
WORKERS DEFENSE$25,000
TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK$25,000
1K WOMEN STRONG INC$10,000
LUPE VOTES$10,000
GROUND GAME TX$10,000
JOLT$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jolt Initiative

Jolt Initiative is a non-profit organization that increases the civic participation of Latinos in Texas to build a stronger democracy and ensure that everyone's voice is heard.

Civil Rights

Texas Justice Fund

To support legal, political & administrative efforts to protect fair voting.

—

Texas Blue Action Fund

To register and educate voters in Texas to increase civic engagement and voter turnout.

Civil Rights

Texas Campaign for the Environment

Empowering Texans to fight pollution through sustained grassroots organizing campaigns that shift corporate and governmental policy.

Environment

Texas Afl-Cio

Support Labor Unions in Texas

—

Polichic Engagement Fund

The PoliChic Engagement Fund is focused on promoting civic participation and strengthening democracy for women and their families in Texas through education and awareness initiatives.

Civil Rights

Eqtx Equality Texas dba Equality Texas

Equality Texas works to secure full equality for LGBTQ+ Texans.

—

Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services

Texans for Opportunity

Educate and unite Texans behind sound public policy that protects the Texas way of life and improves economic opportunity for all Texans

Community Improvement

Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights

Annie's List Training and Engagement Fund

Annies List Training and Engagement Fund seeks to advance the participation of women in the electoral process in Texas by providing training and engagement opportunities and to advocate for reproductive and social justice for Texas women…

Community Improvement

Texas Values Action

Texas values action directly advocates for faith, family and freedom in the political arena.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Freedom Network and the most unlike its peers is Faith in Texas - Pico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

9/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$680,000Civil Rights$145,000Public Benefit$120,000Education$110,000Community Improvement$25,000Religion$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Way to Win Action Fund IncDC26.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Way to Win Action Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Clean and Prosperous America · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation · The Heising-Simons Action Fund · Women Donors Network Action · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · Energy Action Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEXAS FOR ALL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAIR SHOT TEXAS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~19 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 871208533 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAIR SHOT TEXAS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 19 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Texas for All?

Find your warmest path to Texas for All through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEXAS FOR ALL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas for All?

More from the funding graph

TEXAS FOR ALL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas for All?

More from the funding graph