· Public charity
Texas for All
The organization is established for the purpose of supporting coordinated investments and strategies that advance the social welfare of underrepresented communities in texas with a particular focus on people of color, people with disabilities, women, young, queer and gender diverse, and workingclass people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD TEXAS VOTES | $25,000 |
| MI FAMILIA VOTA | $25,000 |
| TEXAS AFT | $25,000 |
| TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECTS | $25,000 |
| BATTLEGROUND TEXAS ENGAGEMENT FUND | $25,000 |
| TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK | $25,000 |
| MOVE TEXAS ACTION FUND | $25,000 |
| ONE APIA TEXAS INC | $25,000 |
| WORKERS DEFENSE | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE | $25,000 |
| JOLT | $10,000 |
| GROUND GAME TX | $10,000 |
| LUPE VOTES | $10,000 |
| 1K WOMEN STRONG INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMOVE TEXAS ACTION FUND2× · 2022–2024 · $140k · revenue +2%
- BEBGTX Engagement Fund2× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue -24%
- TFTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK2× · 2022–2024 · $135k · revenue -27%
Funded once
- CVCOMMUNITY VOICES FOR PUBLIC EDUCATIONone grant, 2022 · $110k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $110k
- FSFAIR SHOT TEXASgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $110k · revenue +96%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jolt Initiative is a non-profit organization that increases the civic participation of Latinos in Texas to build a stronger democracy and ensure that everyone's voice is heard.
To support legal, political & administrative efforts to protect fair voting.
The Texas Future Action Fund supports and elevates civic engagement efforts of organizations in Texas through grantmaking, donor education, and fundraising to build long-term political power in our state.
The PoliChic Engagement Fund is committed to fostering civic participation among women and their families in Texas.
Register and Educate Voters in Texas to increase civic engagement and voter turn out.
Asian Texans for Justice connects Asian and Pacific Islander Texans with civic action to build personal and political power.
Empowering Texans to fight pollution through sustained grassroots organizing campaigns that shift corporate and governmental policy.
MOVE Texas Civic Funds builds the power of young Texans through civic engagement, leadership development, and issue advocacy.
Empower voters and defend democracy in Texas. Provide support to local Leagues and support the development of new local chapters.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Freedom Network and the most unlike its peers is Faith in Texas - Pico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOVE TEXAS ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds BGTX Engagement Fund ↗
- Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOICES FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds FAIR SHOT TEXAS ↗
- Who funds FAIR DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD TEXAS VOTES ↗
- Who funds MI FAMILIA VOTA ↗
- Who funds WORKERS DEFENSE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds ARENA SUMMIT ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO ↗
- Who funds 1K Women Strong Inc ↗
- Who funds Ground Game Texas ↗
- Who funds LUPE VOTES ↗
- Who funds JOLT ACTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Way to Win Action Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Clean and Prosperous America · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation · Future Forward USA Action · The Heising-Simons Action Fund · Women Donors Network Action · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texas for All funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Texas for All?
Find your warmest path to Texas for All through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.