Skip to content

· Private foundation

Teto Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MEnvironment$875kFood & Nutrition$720kArts & Culture$345kHousing & Shelter$300kPhilanthropy$245kEducation$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $693k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
ELCA WORLD HUNGER$50,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES$50,000
GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$50,000
SALVATION ARMY$50,000
BETHESDA MISSION$35,000
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES$35,000
YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK$35,000
GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
LANCASTER CONSERVANCY$35,000
AARON'S ACRES$30,000
DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED$30,000
SCHREIBER PEDIATRIC REHAB CENTER$30,000
EAGLE MOUNT BOZEMAN$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $790k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%NEW SUN RISING: $15k → 11%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%NEW SUN RISING: $10k → 11%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%NEW SUN RISING: $5k → 11%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES: $50k → 8%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $40k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $35k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $35k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $30k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $30k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $30k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%HEROES AND HORSES INC: $10k → 10%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
PA
CA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 41 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
5

Total granted

$6.7M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+15%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +24%
  • WE
    WINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING
    7× · 2019–2025 · $340k · revenue +113% · 36% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $325k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CP
    CONHAL PA FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +15%
  • AF
    ALLEGHENY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
4
Riverbend Environmental Education Center

Riverbend's purpose is to foster an awareness, appreciation, and understanding of our total environment through educational programming. by growing both the love of nature and environmental literacy, we aim to inspire action that…

Environment
5
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Irvine Natural Science Center Inc

We all thrive outdoors. we encourage lifelong engagement with the natural world through environmental learning and green living. at irvine, we inspire people to explore, respect and protect nature.

Environment
8
Wyncote Academy

To work with the under achieving students to meet their true potential. as a special education certification school, wyncote academy maintains dual licensure as a private academic and special education school.

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Halleck Creek Ranch

Our programs empower participants by focusing on their abilities, helping them achieve personal goals, surpass limitations, and celebrate their strengths.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
12
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association for Nature-Based Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loving Reins. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $800,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $355,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA: $350,000 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICABETHESDA MISSION: $215,000 · OtherBETHESDA MISSIONYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $215,000 · OtherYORK COUNTY FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYORK RESCUE MISSION: $175,000 · OtherYORK RESCUE MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $130,000 · Other+19 more: $675,000 · Other+19 moreWINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING: $340,000 · HealthWINDHORSE EQUINE LE…LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $325,000 · HealthLANCASTER COUNTY TH…SCHREIBER CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT: $205,000 · HealthSCHREIBER CENTER FO…UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION: $175,000 · HealthUNITED DISABILITIES…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS …Arbor Place Inc: $40,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthNATUREBRIDGE: $215,000 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGEDONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED: $180,000 · EnvironmentDONEGAL CHAPTE…LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $150,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER COUN…GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $130,000 · EnvironmentGALLATIN VALLE…ASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC: $125,000 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION FO…LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $65,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER FARM…UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC: $350,000 · Human ServicesUNITED CHURCH…NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $215,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINI…AARON'S ACRES: $185,000 · Human ServicesAARON'S ACRESNEW SUN RISING: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $325,000 · Arts & CultureTENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterEagle Mount: $185,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,250,000Health$1,170,000Environment$865,000Human Services$790,000Arts & Culture$325,000Housing & Shelter$300,000Philanthropy$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC: $350,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING: $340,000 over 7y, 36% of budgetTHE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $325,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $325,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetTENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING: $300,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $215,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $215,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $215,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSCHREIBER CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT: $205,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetEagle Mount: $185,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetAARON'S ACRES: $185,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetDONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED: $180,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $130,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetEUREKA COLLEGE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE INC: $70,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMANUEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 over 5y, 94% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArbor Place Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNEW SUN RISING: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARBOR PLACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLENN HOPE CARE FARM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds THE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
  • Who funds TENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING ↗
  • Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SCHREIBER CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
  • Who funds AARON'S ACRES ↗
  • Who funds DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EUREKA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EMANUEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Arbor Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW SUN RISING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · The Steinman Foundation · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Upmc Group · Ppl Foundation · Fulton Family Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Wellspan Health · Powder Mill Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teto Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teto Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teto Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Teto Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Teto’s filings →

More from the funding graph