· Private foundation
Teto Corporation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $693k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| ELCA WORLD HUNGER | $50,000 |
| UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES | $50,000 |
| GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER | $50,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $50,000 |
| LANCASTER CONSERVANCY | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| NEW HOPE MINISTRIES | $35,000 |
| YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK | $35,000 |
| BETHESDA MISSION | $35,000 |
| GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST | $35,000 |
| EAGLE MOUNT BOZEMAN | $30,000 |
| AARON'S ACRES | $30,000 |
| WINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING | $30,000 |
| DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $790k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +15%
- WEWINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING7× · 2019–2025 · $340k · revenue +113% · 36% of their budget
- LCLANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING7× · 2019–2025 · $325k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- CPCONHAL PA FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $50k
- CPCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANKone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +15%
- HAHEROES AND HORSES INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
Riverbend's purpose is to foster an awareness, appreciation, and understanding of our total environment through educational programming. by growing both the love of nature and environmental literacy, we aim to inspire action that…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
We all thrive outdoors. we encourage lifelong engagement with the natural world through environmental learning and green living. at irvine, we inspire people to explore, respect and protect nature.
To work with the under achieving students to meet their true potential. as a special education certification school, wyncote academy maintains dual licensure as a private academic and special education school.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Our programs empower participants by focusing on their abilities, helping them achieve personal goals, surpass limitations, and celebrate their strengths.
To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association for Nature-Based Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Loving Reins. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds WINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC D/B/A GREYSTONE MANOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
- Who funds THE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds TENFOLD COMMUNITY LENDING ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SCHREIBER CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
- Who funds AARON'S ACRES ↗
- Who funds DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds EUREKA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Arbor Place Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW SUN RISING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · The Steinman Foundation · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Upmc Group · Ppl Foundation · Fulton Family Foundation · Ferree Foundation · Wellspan Health · Powder Mill Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teto Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Teto Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Teto Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.