Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tess White Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$55kYouth Development$47kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$43kHealth$25kEducation$23kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAL FARLEY BOYS RANCH$11,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ONE MAN'S TREASURE$5,000
HEARTS AND HANDS OF EAST TX$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%FOREVER FAMILIES: $8k → 21%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
CA
VA
NC
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$237k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+38%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    ONE MAN'S TREASURE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +692%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $25k · revenue +106%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOREVER FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • VA
    VOGEL ALCOVE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dallas Food Pantry

North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.

Human Services
2
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
3
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
4
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
5
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
6
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
7
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
8
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
9
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
10
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
11
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
12
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Irving Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAL FARLEY BOYS RANCH: $33,000 · OtherCAL FARLEY BOYS RANCHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $27,900 · OtherEAST TEXAS FOOD BANKWOODROW HS FOUNDATION: $23,000 · OtherWOODROW HS FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY: $22,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,400 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKCAL FARLY BOYS RANCH: $12,000 · OtherCAL FARLY BOYS RANCHPEROT MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherPEROT MUSEUMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+10 more: $25,200 · Other+10 moreONE MAN'S TREASURE: $55,000 · Crime & LegalONE MAN'S TREASURETEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $25,000 · HealthTEXAS SCO…FOREVER FAMILIES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $3,158 · PhilanthropyDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP: $3,500 · Employment
Other$179,000Crime & Legal$55,000Health$25,000Human Services$17,500Philanthropy$8,158Environment$5,000Employment$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE MAN'S TREASURE: $55,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER FAMILIES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP: $3,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $3,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRVING HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE MAN'S TREASURE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IRVING HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tess White Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tess White Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tess White Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tess White Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tess White’s filings →

    More from the funding graph