Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tess White Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Crime & Legal$55kYouth Development$47kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$43kHealth$25kEducation$23kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAL FARLEY BOYS RANCH$11,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ONE MAN'S TREASURE$5,000
HEARTS AND HANDS OF EAST TX$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%FOREVER FAMILIES: $8k → 21%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
CA
VA
NC
DC
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$237k · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$237k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+38%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    ONE MAN'S TREASURE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +692%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $25k · revenue +37%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOREVER FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +10%
  • GV
    GOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -97%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dallas Food Pantry

North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.

Human Services
2
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
3
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
4
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
5
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

6
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
7
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

8
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

9
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
10
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

11
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

12
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Irving Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAL FARLEY BOYS RANCH — $33,000 · OtherCAL FARLEY BOYS RANCHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $27,900 · OtherEAST TEXAS FOOD BANKWOODROW HS FOUNDATION — $23,000 · OtherWOODROW HS FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY — $22,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $15,400 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKCAL FARLY BOYS RANCH — $12,000 · OtherCAL FARLY BOYS RANCHPEROT MUSEUM — $10,000 · OtherPEROT MUSEUMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+10 more — $25,200 · Other+10 moreONE MAN'S TREASURE — $55,000 · Crime & LegalONE MAN'S TREASURETEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $25,000 · HealthTEXAS SCO…FOREVER FAMILIES INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE — $5,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY — $5,000 · PhilanthropyEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $3,158 · PhilanthropyDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP — $3,500 · Employment
Other$179,000Crime & Legal$55,000Health$25,000Human Services$17,500Philanthropy$8,158Environment$5,000Employment$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONE MAN'S TREASURE — $55,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $15,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER FAMILIES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP — $3,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $3,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRVING HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE MAN'S TREASURE
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds FOREVER FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY BANK COMMUNITY
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds IRVING HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tess White Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tess White Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tess White Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph