Skip to content

· Public charity

Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc

To educate the public and promote private and public innovation and research to increase access to quality housing in the u.s.

$375k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The San Francisco Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $375k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’22
6
’23
5
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.5MCommunity Improvement$150k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A NEW WAY OF LIFE$75,000
CREDEVOLV$75,000
HOUSING CONNECTOR$75,000
KIT SWITCH$75,000
REVALUEIO$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MODULE: $75k → 11%REVALUEIO: $75k → 10%THE KELSEY: $75k → 10%LOS ANGELES ROOM AND BOARD: $75k → 14%PRONTO HOUSING INC: $75k → 17%CREDEVOLV: $75k → 10%TRUST NEIGHBORHOODS: $100k → 15%FWD SLASH INC: $19k → 14%THE GUILD: $75k → 14%UNCHARTED: $150k → 12%LADDERUP HOUSING INC: $19k → 18%HOUSING CONNECTOR: $75k → 9%PARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED: $75k → 19%ROC USA LLC: $75k → 7%FIRM FOUNDATION COMMUNITY HOUSING: $75k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $318k → 10%WHITE PICKET FENCE VALUATIONS LLCAPPRAISAL INSIGHTS: $19k → 17%FROLIC INSTITUTE: $75k → 9%BUILD CASA: $19k → 10%KIT SWITCH: $75k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes for California Dba Homes for Sonoma

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter
2
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
3
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
4
Fair Housing Council of Oregon

FHCO is a statewide civil rights organization whose mission is to end illegal housing discrimination and promote equal access to housing choice through education and enforcement of fair housing law.

Unclassified
5
Fair Housing Foundation

The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
6
Innovative Housing Inc

Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
7
The Urbanist

Seattle-based online publication seeking to examine and influence urban policies.

Community Improvement
8
Burbank Housingsr Corporation

To own and operate affordable rental housing.

—
9
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
10
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
11
Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund

The Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund elects candidates, educates voters and decision-makers, and amplifies the voices and priorities of people and communities most impacted by housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Contemporary Housing Alternatives of Florida Inc

Our mission is focused on urban revitalization by providing affordable, vibrant, multi-family housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. we offer rental units throughout pinellas county at and below market rates to…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Connector; the most unlike its peers is A New Way of Life Reentry Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNCHARTED: $150,000 · OtherUNCHARTEDKIT SWITCH: $75,000 · OtherKIT SWITCHCREDEVOLV: $75,000 · OtherCREDEVOLVREVALUEIO: $75,000 · OtherREVALUEIOMODULE DESIGN INC: $75,000 · OtherMODULE DESIGN INCTHE GUILD: $75,000 · OtherTHE GUILDPRONTO HOUSING INC: $75,000 · OtherPRONTO HOUSING INC+4 more: $75,000 · Other+4 moreROC USA LLC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterROC USA LLCLos Angeles Room & Board: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterLos Angeles Room & BoardKELSEY: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterKELSEYHOUSING CONNECTOR: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING CONNECTORPARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterPARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATEDFirm Foundation Community Housing: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterFirm Foundation Community HousingFROLIC INSTITUTE: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterFROLIC INSTITUTETHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $318,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOU…TRUST NEIGHBORHOODS: $100,000 · Community ImprovementA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $75,000 · Health
Other$675,000Housing & Shelter$525,000Philanthropy$318,000Community Improvement$100,000Health$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $318,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNCHARTED: $150,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetTRUST NEIGHBORHOODS: $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLos Angeles Room & Board: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKELSEY: $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHOUSING CONNECTOR: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFirm Foundation Community Housing: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA13.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Parity Baltimore Incorporated: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc?

Find your warmest path to Terner Housing Innovation Labs Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Terner Housing Innovation Labs’ filings →

More from the funding graph