Skip to content

· Private foundation

Teri and Dean Flanders Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Teri and Dean Flanders Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Teri and Dean Flanders Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $59k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
6
’18
6
’19
9
’20
12
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.6MReligion$80kArts & Culture$71kEducation$37kFood & Nutrition$29kHuman Services$16kHousing & Shelter$12kHealth$12kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS CHURCH$13,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH - MORAN EYE CNTR$10,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$10,000
HALE CENTER THEATRE$6,360
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH$5,000
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
ZAMBIA'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND$2,000
SHELTER THE HOMELESS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
UNITED WAY OF SALT LAKE$1,000
5 FOR THE FIGHT$1,000
ST MARY'S HEALTH WAGON$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $1k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 12 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$260k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+102%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +93%
  • HC
    HALE CENTRE THEATRE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +95%
  • SM
    ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • OR
    OUR RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +102%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
3
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
United Way of Greater Salt Lake

United way of salt lake (uwsl) mobilizes people and resources to support basic needs and education.

Human Services
11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $2,573,482 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLDS CHURCH: $79,765 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH - MORAN EYE CNTR: $50,000 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANK: $27,500 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · Other+4 more: $9,000 · OtherHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $19,860 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE: $1,500 · Arts & CultureUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $11,000 · InternationalST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $10,500 · HealthZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationTHE INN BETWEEN: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $2,500 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$2,575,482Other$220,765Arts & Culture$21,360International$11,000Health$10,500Education$9,000Human Services$5,500Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $2,573,482 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $19,860 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSHELTER THE HOMELESS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HALE CENTRE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Ashton Family Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teri and Dean Flanders Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teri and Dean Flanders Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teri and Dean Flanders’ filings →

    More from the funding graph