Skip to content
Terebelo Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Terebelo Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2022
27
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Terebelo Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Donors Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Terebelo Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $176k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’18
9
’19
15
’20
14
’21
13
’22
21
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$944kReligion$230kHuman Services$25kEducation$23kSocial Science$11kArts & Culture$8kHealth$1kAnimals$433Other$0
02FY2022 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k20 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $142k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DONORS FUND$47,971
AHAVAS CHESED$23,000
MECHON OHR OLAM XXX-XX-XXXX$18,400
Individual grant recipient$17,190
LAKEWOOD CHEDER$15,705
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
YESHIVA KATANA OF PASSAIC$7,000
BAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KTC$5,000
KOLLEL INSTITUTE OF GREATER DETROIT$5,000
ZICHRON AVOT$5,000
YESHIVA OHEL TORAH$1,600
CHEVRA LOMDEI TORAH$1,500
BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $600 → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKAH: $10k → 11%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $100 → 20%A TIME: $560 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $48 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $48 → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $700 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
KS
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 38 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
64

Total granted

$253k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+37%

Still filing today

18%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +54%
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • MN
    MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONG OHAVEI TORAH
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SUPPORTERS OF TORAH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • CK
    CRANBURY KOLLEL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
6
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
9
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
10
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
11
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
12
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ktana of Passaic; the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONORS FUND INC: $941,988 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $38,203 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAIS ARON VYISROEL RABBINICAL INSTITUTE: $33,100 · OtherBAIS ARON VYISROEL RABBINICA…CONG OHAVEI TORAH: $30,000 · OtherCONG OHAVEI TORAHAHAVAS CHESED: $23,000 · OtherAHAVAS CHESEDCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION GATES OF MERCYEOM: $18,500 · OtherMECHON OHR OLAM XXX-XX-XXXX: $18,400 · OtherZICHRON AVOT: $16,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · Other+102 more: $104,544 · Other+102 moreLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $21,544 · EducationBAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED INC: $5,000 · EducationMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $1,900 · Education+4 more: $1,575 · EducationYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $7,000 · ReligionYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $4,630 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · ReligionDAF A WEEK INC: $1,500 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $1,200 · ReligionBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $1,000 · Religion+4 more: $825 · ReligionAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $1,600 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $700 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $560 · Human Services+1 more: $196 · Human ServicesAHAVAS CHESSED 613 CORP: $13,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA KOL BONAYICH INC: $100 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 · HealthCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $66 · International
Philanthropy$941,988Other$349,547Education$30,019Religion$20,655Human Services$13,056Food & Nutrition$13,000Health$136International$66

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORS FUND INC: $941,988 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $21,544 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS CHESSED 613 CORP: $13,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $4,630 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAF A WEEK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $863 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOR YESHURIM INC: $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMATAN B'SETER BAMBIINC: $196 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF IRGUN TOMCHEI TORAH KOLLELEI RAMOT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $66 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $32 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIZMAN TORAH SOLUTIONS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS CHESSED 613 CORP ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS TZEDAKA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds DAF A WEEK INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAS CHESED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundZichron Btz Tzedakah …Zichron Chaim Charity…Donors Fund IncJewish Community Foun…The Fishoff Family Fo…The Jmg FoundationNational Society for …Keren Yud Mem IncJoseph Chehebar Famil…
The Ojc FundNY41.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Keren Yud Mem Inc · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terebelo Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terebelo Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
  • Mesivta Nezer Hatorah: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Terebelo Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Terebelo Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Terebelo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home