Skip to content

· Public charity

Telluride AIDS Benefit Inc

Aids/hiv education and awareness

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$628kInternational$5kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $38,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,324 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,324 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK$10,000
ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$7,000
ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND$7,000
BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER$7,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $20k → 10%MOAB HEALTH CLINIC: $7k → 11%RED RIBBON PROJECT: $5k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $37k → 10%WESTCAP: $38k → 11%COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK: $33k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $14k → 10%MOAB FREE CLINIC: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%WESTCAP: $33k → 11%COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK: $15k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $12k → 10%MOAB HEALTH CLINIC: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $22k → 10%WESTCAP: $15k → 11%COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK: $10k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $12k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $17k → 10%WESTCAP: $15k → 11%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $35k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $9k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $13k → 10%ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $31k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $9k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $9k → 10%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $30k → 12%ETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $7k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $9k → 10%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $29k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY PROGRAM: $7k → 10%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $20k → 12%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $19k → 12%BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against -85% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$623k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-85%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BJ
    BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $171k · revenue +30% · 33% of their budget
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado
    7× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +86%
  • CH
    COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $58k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • KI
    KARIS INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue -148%
  • GU
    GENERATION UBUNTU INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -85%
  • RR
    RED RIBBON PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthcare Access Worldwide Inc

Healthcare Access Worldwide, Inc. (HAWI) is the first of its kind, comprehensive healthcare resource center. This is a place where all issues pertaining to health, wellness and disease can be discussed freely and openly. HAWI continues to…

Health
2
The World Health Clinicians Inc

To prevent the spread of hiv/aids and sexually transmitted diseases, and to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing worlds through treatment, education, patient advocacy and assistance.

International
3
Novus Health Inc

Novus health achieves its mission through the vision to become a trusted, patient-centered medical model home, providing equitable access to primary care and linking individuals to the specialty care and preventative services that are…

Health
4
Washington Health Institute

To improve the health of our community by providing holistic, patient-centered, outcomes driven care, support services, and health sciences research to transform the lives of our patients, their families, and underserved communities. we…

Health
5
Siouxland Community Health Center

Inspiring and empowering our community through health equity for all.

Health
6
Lowell Community Health Center Inc

Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…

Health
7
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
8
Vivent Health Inc

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

Health
9
Ethne Health Inc

Ethne health delivers comprehensive, high value healthcare through a culturally sensitive, neighbor-centered medical home. we offer primary care (for both adults and kids), acute care, psychiatry, early obstetrics, gynecology, and hiv…

Health
10
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
11
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

—
12
The Addis Clinic Inc

To connect volunteer physicians to global health challenges using telemedicine

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Health Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $170,500 · HealthBROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTERChildren's Hospital Colorado: $76,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital ColoradoCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC: $57,500 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INCMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC: $17,000 · HealthWESTCAP: $100,500 · OtherWESTCAPETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUND: $82,440 · OtherETHIOPIAN FAMILY FUNDUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $72,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $47,000 · OtherST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,000 · OtherGENERATION UBUNTU INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRED RIBBON PROJECT: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$321,500Other$306,940Philanthropy$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER: $170,500 over 8y, 33% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $76,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC: $57,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $47,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC: $17,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetRED RIBBON PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds KARIS INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION UBUNTU INC ↗
  • Who funds RED RIBBON PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Telluride AIDS Benefit Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Telluride AIDS Benefit Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Telluride AIDS Benefit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph