Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Teget Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$136kHealth$110kYouth Development$59kArts & Culture$45kFood & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$38kReligion$18kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$2,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$16,000
SHENANDOAH FOOD PANTRY$12,000
AT STILL UNIVERSITY$9,000
HAYS MED FOUNDATION$5,250
CRETE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST-BACKPACK PROGRAM$5,000
MAYO CLINIC$4,000
HAYS BOY SCOUT TROOP #101$4,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$4,000
FIRST CALL FOR HELP$4,000
MAY MENTORING (GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION)$3,500
COLLEGE FOR KIDS$3,000
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE #74$3,000
CRETE AREA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$3,000
DANCE MAKER ACADEMY$3,000
BLUE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING HANDS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
SD
IA
CO
NE
MO
VA
KS
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$473k · 43 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
7

Total granted

$473k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+65%

Still filing today

26%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    First Call for Help Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +9%
  • AT
    A T Still University of Health Sciences
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +29%
  • BR
    Blue River Arts Council Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • CC
    COE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • AM
    ART MAKER LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +65%
  • TL
    THE LITTLE LIGHTHOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clay County Educational Endowment Association Inc
Education
2
Boone County Education Foundat

The program service accomplishments provided grants for teachers and scholarships for students in the boone county school system

Education
3
Uta Jerome Nerman Family Foundation

Scholarship fund

Education
4
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
5
Hastings College

Hastings college is a private, co-education, residential, liberal arts college founded in 1882.

Education
6
Shenandoah Iowa Education Foundation

Support educational opportunities of students and faculty of the shenandoah community school district

Education
7
Chattanooga Orthopaedic Educational & Research Foundation
8
Iowa Peo Project Fund Inc
Philanthropy
9
Cook County Educational Foundation Inc

Provide scholarships to students

Education
10
Upper Midwest Scholarship Fund
11
Madisonville College Foundation
Education
12
Stafford Community Usd Educational Foundation

Educational development through scholarship to state colleges and universities and capital improvements to public schools in stafford community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shenandoah Education Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
15/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $43,000 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITYSHENANDOAH FOOD PANTRY — $37,500 · OtherSHENANDOAH FOOD PANTRYSHENANDOAH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $29,850 · OtherSHENANDOAH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONHAYS MED FOUNDATION — $28,499 · OtherHAYS MED FOUNDATIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $20,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherHAYS BOY SCOUT TROOP #101 — $19,000 · OtherCRETE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST-BACKPACK PROGRAM — $18,000 · Other+33 more — $166,150 · Other+33 moreA T Still University of Health Sciences — $14,500 · EducationA T Still Un…UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…CRETE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationCRETE PUBLIC…SHENANDOAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · EducationSHENANDOAH E…HAYS PUBLIC LIBRARY TRUST — $5,500 · EducationHAYS PUBLIC …COE COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationCOE COLLEGEFirst Call for Help Inc — $21,000 · HealthFirst Cal…CRETE AREA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $13,000 · HealthCRETE ARE…MAYO CLINIC — $8,000 · HealthMAYO CLIN…Blue River Arts Council Inc — $14,000 · Arts & CultureART MAKER LLC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureHelping Hand — $500 · Human Services
Other$381,999Education$53,000Health$42,000Arts & Culture$16,000Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFirst Call for Help Inc — $21,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences — $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBlue River Arts Council Inc — $14,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCRETE AREA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC — $12,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSTUDENT OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIA — $10,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRETE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSHENANDOAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 6y, 10.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHAYS PUBLIC LIBRARY TRUST — $5,500 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART MAKER LLC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHelping Hand — $500 over 1y, 24% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds First Call for Help Inc
  • Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences
  • Who funds Blue River Arts Council Inc
  • Who funds CRETE AREA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HAYS ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds STUDENT OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CRETE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HAYS PUBLIC LIBRARY TRUST
  • Who funds COE COLLEGE
  • Who funds ART MAKER LLC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teget Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph