Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Technology Club of Syracuse

FOSTERING INTEREST IN AND KNOWLEDGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY. Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
13
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$22,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.9M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Technology Club of Syracuse funded were first-time grantees, receiving 31% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving13$36k46%
FY20236$45k50%
FY20226$40k67%
FY20213$23k67%
FY20203$13k100%
FY20191$13k0%
FY20181$14k0%
FY20171$16kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$152kEducation$39kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($3k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Technology Club of Syracuse supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMuseum of Science & Technology Foundation: $109,200 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetDiscovery Center of Science & Technology: $32,900 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOnondaga Community College Foundation Inc: $21,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLe Moyne College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartners for Education and Business Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Syracuse and Onondaga County: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York State Science Olympiad Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCentral New York Technology Development Organization Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCayuga Museum of History & Art Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProject Fibonacci Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAviation Historical Society of Central New York Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetGriffiss Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNysascd: $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allyn Family Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allyn Family Foundation Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Technology Club of Syracuse with peer funders

About Technology Club of Syracuse

How much does Technology Club of Syracuse give?
Technology Club of Syracuse reported 13 grants totaling $35,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Technology Club of Syracuse fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (77%), Education (19%), Arts & Culture (1%).
Who are Technology Club of Syracuse's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Museum of Science & Technology Foundation ($109k), Discovery Center of Science & Technology ($33k), Onondaga Community College Foundation Inc ($22k).
Does Technology Club of Syracuse fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Technology Club of Syracuse accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Technology Club of Syracuse?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Allyn Family Foundation Inc, Equitable Foundation Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Technology Club of Syracuse based?
Technology Club of Syracuse is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Technology Club of Syracuse’s filings →

More from the funding graph