Skip to content
Plinth

· Charitable trust

Teamsters Joint Council No25 Charitable Trust

To raise and distribute funds to charitable organizations as selected by the organization

$48k
Granted FY2020
3
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172020.

Health$40kEducation$35kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$5kOther$26k
02FY2020 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $20,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $47,900 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IN SEARCH OF A CURE$10,000
SWEENEY CLASSIC$5,000
MISERICORDIA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MISERICORDIA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Olympics Wisconsin Inc

The mission of special olympics wisconsin, inc. is to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing…

Recreation & Sports
2
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
3
Illinois So Foundation

Illinois s.o. foundation is an illinois nonprofit corporation that was formed by special olympics illinois, inc. to support their mission of providing a variety of olympic-type sports for peole with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
4
Special Olympics Inc

Special olympics strives to create a better world by fostering the acceptance and inclusion of people of all abilities through sports, health and education programs.

Recreation & Sports
5
Chicago Sports Summit Foundation

The chicago sports summit foundation was created to support the physical and educational development of chicago area youth through partnerships with local charities sharing the same vision.

Recreation & Sports
6
Olympic Club Foundation

Our mission is to financially support programs which share our belief that participation in organized athletics enriches young lives and develops future community leaders.

Religion
7
Special Olympics Michigan Inc

The special olympics movement uses sport as a vehicle for acceptance, respect, inclusion, dignity, and joy. we provide year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with intellectual disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
8
Special Olympics Rhode Island Inc

To provide year-round sports training & athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities.

9
United States Sailing Association Inc

The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.

Recreation & Sports
10
Chicago White Sox Charities Inc

Chicago white sox charities ("cwsc") provides financial and emotional support to chicago-based organizations, including those leading the fight against cancer, dedicated to improving the lives of youth through recreation and education, and…

Human Services
11
Chicago City Soccer Club

Chicago city soccer club is committed to providing opportunities for young people in the city of chicago, illinois to learn and play soccer in a healthy and positive environment, and to guiding chicago youth soccer players in the…

Recreation & Sports
12
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Navy Safe Harbor Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sweeney Classic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IN SEARCH OF A CURE — $40,000 · HealthIN SEARCH OF A CUREJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $25,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSH…JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $10,000 · EducationJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTDTHE ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL — $10,000 · OtherTHE ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPE…SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $6,200 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOI…Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $5,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of th…TEAMSTERS LOCAL 700 BENEVOLENT FUND — $5,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS LOCAL 700 BENE…SWEENEY CLASSIC — $5,000 · PhilanthropySWEENEY CLASSI…OTIS WILSON CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyOTIS WILSON CH…NAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNAVY SAFE HARB…MISERICORDIA HOME — $5,000 · Human Services
Health$40,000Education$35,000Other$26,200Philanthropy$15,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIN SEARCH OF A CURE — $40,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWEENEY CLASSIC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS WILSON CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teamsters Joint Council No25 Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Teamsters Joint Council No25 Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Teamsters Joint Council No25 Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph