Skip to content
Teamsters All Charities Fund at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Teamsters All Charities Fund

To solicit funds and carry on fundraising events with the purpose of making charitable donations, direct relief of the poor and distressed or of the under-priviledged and to engage in and/or provide funding for educational activities.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$185kEducation$145kHealth$103kMembership Benefit$96kPhilanthropy$88kEmployment$58kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $99,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $164,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$26,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Joint Council 42 Charity Fund$53,000
TARP INC$26,500
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$10,000
Loveall Foundation for Children$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TARP INC: $27k → 10%TARP INC: $26k → 16%TARP INC: $27k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 7 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$550k
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+84%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEmploymentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665
    2× · 2017–2018 · $220k · revenue +46%
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $90k · revenue +26%
  • TL
    THE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +235%

Funded once

  • TL
    Teamsters Local 517
    one grant, 2023 · $96k
  • TS
    The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue -67%
  • JR
    JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
3
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 238

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
4
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 631

To organize all workers and to seure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
7
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 330

To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.

—
8
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—
9
Teamsters Local Union 639

To represent members and provide bargaining services.

—
10
Laborers International Union of North America

Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.

—
11
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 342

Labor union representing the electrical worker force

—
12
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 640

Labor Organizing

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters' Assistance Program; the most unlike its peers is The Loveall Foundation for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665: $220,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665Teamsters Local 517: $95,800 · OtherTeamsters Local 517International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $53,000 · OtherInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint CouncilTEAMSTERS ALCOHOL REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $40,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS ALCOHOL REHABILITATION PROGRAMJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $22,400 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $90,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTH…PEGGY BROWNING FUND: $40,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUNDUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationTHE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOVEALL FO…The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $28,000 · PhilanthropyThe Southern C…TARP INC: $79,375 · Human ServicesTARP INCTeamsters' Assistance Program: $11,000 · EmploymentWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$451,200Education$135,000Philanthropy$98,000Human Services$79,375Employment$11,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665: $220,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTARP INC: $79,375 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetTHE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTEAMSTERS ALCOHOL REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $40,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $28,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetTeamsters' Assistance Program: $11,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 137: $6,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teamsters All Charities Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teamsters All Charities Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teamsters All Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home