· Public charity
Teamsters All Charities Fund
To solicit funds and carry on fundraising events with the purpose of making charitable donations, direct relief of the poor and distressed or of the under-priviledged and to engage in and/or provide funding for educational activities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $87,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $153,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,550 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teamsters Scholarship Fund | $45,000 |
| TARP INC | $26,500 |
| Loveall Foundation for Children | $10,000 |
| TEAMSTERS LOCAL 137 | $6,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 6652× · 2017–2018 · $220k · revenue +46%
- IBINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +26%
- TLTHE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +235%
Funded once
- TLTeamsters Local 517one grant, 2023 · $96k
- TSThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Incone grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue -67%
- JRJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.
It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…
To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…
To organize all workers and to seure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.
Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.
To provide support for its members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working towards eliminating unfair labor practices.
Labor union local-see form 990 part iii, line 4a
Labor union representing the electrical worker force
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters' Assistance Program and the most unlike its peers is The Loveall Foundation for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665 ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds TARP INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS ALCOHOL REHABILITATION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds Teamsters' Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 137 ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teamsters All Charities Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.