Skip to content

· Private foundation

Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$20MRecreation & Sports$19MEnvironment$5.1MYouth Development$5.1MInternational$4.2MCommunity Improvement$750kArts & Culture$695kPhilanthropy$276kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $202k
  • $250k+2 grants · $14M
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREST PARK FOREVER$13,020,000
CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES$1,000,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO$25,000
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$25,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$20,000
SPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING$20,000
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM$20,000
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$12,000
MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS$10,000
ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$10,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
LADUE CHAPEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION$10,000
GRAND CENTER INC$10,000
ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOCUS MARINES FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 24 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$39M
$17M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+4%

Still filing today

83%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18M · revenue +154% · 28% of their budget
  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +70%
  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    one grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue +4%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue -2% · 30% of their budget
  • SL
    ST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $750k · revenue +3% · 28% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
2
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
3
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
7
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
St Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Association

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Science Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of T-Rex. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Forest Park Forever Inc: $18,160,000 · EnvironmentForest Park Forever IncMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $5,080,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEESUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $10,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $5,096,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOLWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,002,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY+3 more: $200,000 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $5,000,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF…URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $500,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE O…ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM: $260,000 · Other+22 more: $1,175,935 · Other+22 moreCENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $4,150,000 · InternationalST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION: $750,000 · Recreation & SportsGRAND CENTER INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $37,500 · Arts & CultureSt Louis Black Repertory Company Inc: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF T-REX: $250,000 · Community Improvement
Environment$23,240,000Education$20,298,000Other$6,935,935International$4,150,000Recreation & Sports$750,000Arts & Culture$392,500Community Improvement$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $18,160,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $10,000,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $5,096,000 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $5,080,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,002,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $5,000,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetCENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $4,150,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION: $750,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $500,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $160,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING INC: $160,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $110,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetGRAND CENTER INC: $80,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAIM HIGH ST LOUIS: $80,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFOCUS MARINES FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWebster University: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProvident Inc: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $37,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Louis Black Repertory Company Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNAVAL HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLOGOS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpstream Theater: $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS LEGACY ICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF T-REX ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ST LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds AIM HIGH ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS MARINES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds Provident Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds St Louis Black Repertory Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAVAL HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOGOS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Upstream Theater ↗
  • Who funds HAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO33× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Centene Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Berges Family Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taylor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taylor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Taylor Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Taylor Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Taylor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph