Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tawa Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$104kCommunity Improvement$85kInternational$50kYouth Development$49kEducation$45kFood & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
CHOC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
TZU CHI FOUNDATION$10,000
THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE 109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCI$5,000
ASIAN YOUTH CENTER$5,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE$5,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$5,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLAN$4,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$4,000
OC PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS EVENT$2,000
BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$421k · 14 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$421k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+18%

Still filing today

64%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +38%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • AY
    ASIAN YOUTH CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CS
    CAA STOP AAPI HATE
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • 2S
    2021 SCA CHINESE SCHOOL-SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

—
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association
Crime & Legal
6
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Union of Pan Asian Communities

To improve the general well-being and education of the asian, pacific islander and other ethnic communities of san diego county. upac recognizes the diverse ethnic and cultural identities and strengths of these communities and their need…

Human Services
8
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank for Monterey County

To distribute food to alleviate hunger, provide emergency food services during a natural disaster, and conduct educational awareness programs relating to hunger issues in monterey county.

Unclassified
10
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

—
11
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding the Foothills

Feeding the foothills mission is to sustain communities by nourishing families experiencing food insecurity, educating the community about hunger, while advocating for hunger relief.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Gabriel Valley Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Nami San Gabriel Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $60,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPECALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $35,400 · OtherCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATIONTHE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherTHE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYFEEDING AMERICA: $20,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICACAA STOP AAPI HATE: $15,000 · OtherCAA: $14,000 · Other2021 SCA CHINESE SCHOOL-SCHOLARSHIP: $12,000 · OtherMOTHER'S DAY DRAWING CONTEST: $11,000 · OtherOC PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS EVENT: $11,000 · Other109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $60,500 · Other+13 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $57,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red…ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $49,000 · Human ServicesASIAN YOUTH CENTERCHOC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $30,000 · HealthChildren's Hospi…BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · ReligionBUDDHIST T…BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 · Community ImprovementEASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3,000 · Community ImprovementSAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $4,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$288,900Human Services$106,500Health$80,000Religion$50,000Community Improvement$17,000Youth Development$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $49,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $35,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budget109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336: $10,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIrvine Police Association: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds 109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336 ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds EASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Irvine Police Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tawa Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tawa Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tawa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph