Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tawa Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$104kCommunity Improvement$85kInternational$50kYouth Development$49kEducation$45kFood & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
TZU CHI FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
CHOC CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
CITY OF HOPE$10,000
THE 109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCI$5,000
ASIAN YOUTH CENTER$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE$5,000
THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION$5,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$5,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$5,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLAN$4,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$4,000
OC PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS EVENT$2,000
BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$421k · 14 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$421k
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

64%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +38%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • AY
    ASIAN YOUTH CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CS
    CAA STOP AAPI HATE
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • 2S
    2021 SCA CHINESE SCHOOL-SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

3
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association
Crime & Legal
6
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
7
Union of Pan Asian Communities

To improve the general well-being and education of the asian, pacific islander and other ethnic communities of san diego county. upac recognizes the diverse ethnic and cultural identities and strengths of these communities and their need…

Human Services
8
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank for Monterey County

To distribute food to alleviate hunger, provide emergency food services during a natural disaster, and conduct educational awareness programs relating to hunger issues in monterey county.

Unclassified
10
Public Health Foundation Enterprises Inc

To enhance the health, wellness, and resilience of every community we serve - see schedule o for more details

11
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding the Foothills

Feeding the foothills mission is to sustain communities by nourishing families experiencing food insecurity, educating the community about hunger, while advocating for hunger relief.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Gabriel Valley Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Nami San Gabriel Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE — $60,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPECALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $35,400 · OtherCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATIONFEEDING AMERICA — $20,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICATHE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY — $20,000 · OtherTHE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYCAA STOP AAPI HATE — $15,000 · OtherCAA — $14,000 · Other2021 SCA CHINESE SCHOOL-SCHOLARSHIP — $12,000 · OtherOC PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS EVENT — $11,000 · OtherMOTHER'S DAY DRAWING CONTEST — $11,000 · Other109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336 — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $60,500 · Other+13 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $57,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red…ASIAN YOUTH CENTER — $49,000 · Human ServicesASIAN YOUTH CENTERCHOC FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $30,000 · HealthChildren's Hospi…BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $50,000 · ReligionBUDDHIST T…BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC — $14,000 · Community ImprovementEASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $3,000 · Community ImprovementSAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $4,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$288,900Human Services$106,500Health$80,000Religion$50,000Community Improvement$17,000Youth Development$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN YOUTH CENTER — $49,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $35,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC — $14,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336 — $10,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetIrvine Police Association — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ASIAN YOUTH CENTER
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds BUENA PARK POLICE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds 109TH PRECINCT COMMUNITY COUNCIL 112417336
  • Who funds SAN GABRIEL VALLEY FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds EASTVALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds Irvine Police Association

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tawa Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph