· Private foundation
Taube Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 106 grants below total $2,312,241 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,756,666 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $444,425 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k78 grants · $137k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $267k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $847k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| National Library of Israel | $500,000 |
| Jewish Community Center of San Francisco | $311,100 |
| Kosciuszko Foundation | $250,000 |
| Oshman Family Jewish Community Center | $248,900 |
| Peninsula Jewish Community Center | $177,800 |
| Osher Marin Jewish Community Center | $112,900 |
| Warriors Community Foundation | $100,000 |
| Jewish Community Center of the East Bay | $56,900 |
| The Heritage Foundation | $50,000 |
| Housing Industry Foundation | $50,000 |
| Center for Security Policy | $50,000 |
| Woodside Village Church | $30,000 |
| The Rutherford Institute | $25,000 |
| The Commonwealth Club of California | $25,000 |
| Israel Guide Dog Center | $25,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
62 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2023, 35 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $51k · revenue +26%- TRTHE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +73%
- 1D10000 DEGREES2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SUStanford University - Gift Processingone grant, 2021 · $2.3M
- AFAmerican Fdn. of the Imperial War Museumone grant, 2019 · $1.3M
- JFJewish Family & Children's Services, SFone grant, 2019 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 290 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds THE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Solano Community College Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING ↗
- Who funds CIVIC NEWS COMPANY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Taube Foundation for Jewish Life and Culture · Koret Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · Marin Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Taube Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Taube Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.