Skip to content

· Public charity

Tarrytowns Rotary Foundation Inc

To raise money via fundraisers and then distribute it to local community related organizations.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$40kArts & Culture$38kFood & Nutrition$31kHuman Services$27kPublic Benefit$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHealth$6kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
1
States reached
$122k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREDERIC BREITBARTH MEMORIAL SCHLSP$10,000
RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC$2,500
RSHM LIFE CENTER$1,500
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,350
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER$1,000
JAZZ FORUM ARTS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
UFSD OF THE TARRYTOWNS$1,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$750
FRIENDS OF MUSIC CONCERTS$750
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE TARRYTOWN$650
WARNER LIBRARY$500
MAKE A WISH HUDSON VALLEY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $3k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $2k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $2k → 9%RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $2k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 28 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
22

Total granted

$126k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+86%

Still filing today

29%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +44%
  • RL
    RSHM Life Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +60%
  • EM
    ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • PB
    PRESS BOX SPLASH FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • FB
    FREDERIC BREITBARTH MEM SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • LA
    LEN ANDREW INTERNATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hudson Valley Day Care Center Inc

To operate a full-day day care center program and after- school

Human Services
2
Hudson River Music Hall Productions Inc

The mission of the Hudson River Music Hall Production, Inc. is to create a community through music and the related arts. Each year, the organization presents over one hundred live performances of music from many different genres.

Arts & Culture
3
Riverviewjazz Org

To present a high quality annual jazz festival in hudson county and make it available for free to the public.

Arts & Culture
4
Tuxedo Historical Society

The Tuxedo Historical Society fosters awareness of the community's heritage by collecting, preserving and exhibiting materials and presenting programs that document life, past and present, in the Town of Tuxedo and its communities.

Arts & Culture
5
Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc

It is the purpose of the Center to deliver the highest quality childcare, youth and adult development services to lower income families and the growing immigrant population in Bridgehampton and surrounding communities through educational…

Human Services
6
Nyack Center

Nyack Center (the organization or the center) is a not-for-profit agency located in Nyack, New York that provides space and programs for community-building, community celebration, and community services for residents of Nyack and all of…

Human Services
7
Tivoli Free Library

The mission of the Tivoli Free Library is two-fold: To facilitate lifelong learning and self education for the members of the surrounding community and to encourage young children and families to develop an ongoing interest in reading and…

—
8
The History Center in Tompkins County Inc

The History Center in Tompkins County, Inc. is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to preserve and encourage access to its unique collections, while designing learning experiences and services that create opportunities for people to…

—
9
Tuesday Musical Club

Promoting and performing music as a fine art.

—
10
Bronxville Historical Conservancy Inc

The Bronxville Historical Conservancy was established to further the understanding and appreciation of the history and current life in the Village of Bronxville, New York.

Arts & Culture
11
Wyckoff Senior Citizens Club
Human Services
12
Niskayuna Community Day Care Center

Niskayuna Community Day Care Center is committed to providing quality child care at a reasonable cost to families with children age three and above. The Organization does this by:Providing a safe, stimulating and nurturing environment for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Hudson Valley; the most unlike its peers is Rshm Life Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESS BOX SPLASH FUND: $17,285 · OtherPRESS BOX SPLASH FUNDUFSD OF THE TARRYTOWNS: $17,111 · OtherUFSD OF THE TARRYTOWNSFREDERIC BREITBARTH MEM SCHOLARSHIP: $15,000 · OtherFREDERIC BREITBARTH MEM SCHOLARSHIPRSHM Life Center: $11,000 · OtherRSHM Life CenterFREDERIC BREITBARTH MEMORIAL SCHLSP: $10,000 · OtherFREDERIC BREITBARTH MEMORIAL SCHLSPBREITBARTH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $9,000 · OtherBREITBARTH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherWARNER LIBRARY: $5,400 · Other+40 more: $55,178 · Other+40 moreRIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesRIVERTOWNS VILLAG…ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $8,500 · Human ServicesELIZABETH MASCIA …Neighborhood House Inc: $5,000 · HealthOPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $4,500 · HealthIRVINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF MUSIC CONCERTS INC: $750 · Arts & Culture
Other$146,974Human Services$29,500Health$9,500Arts & Culture$3,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC: $21,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetRSHM Life Center: $11,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $8,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood House Inc: $5,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetOPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTARRYTOWN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS: $2,651 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIRVINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUSIC CONCERTS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIVERTOWNS VILLAGE GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds RSHM Life Center ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TARRYTOWN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS ↗
  • Who funds IRVINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ FORUM ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MUSIC CONCERTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Faith's House FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Faith's House Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tarrytowns Rotary Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tarrytowns Rotary Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tarrytowns Rotary Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tarrytowns Rotary Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tarrytowns Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph