Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tantillo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$437kHuman Services$161kFood & Nutrition$118kInternational$80kEducation$62kYouth Development$30kHealth$29kArts & Culture$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY$20,000
TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
COMMUNITY LINC INC$15,000
RECONCILIATION SERVICES - THELMA'S KITCHEN$15,000
THE AIDAN PROJECT$10,000
INCLUSION CONNECTIONS PAWSABILITIES$10,000
KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$5,500
BAND OF ANGELS CORP$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
HAPPY BOTTOMS$5,000
KS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER$5,000
HARVESTERS THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK$5,000
PAWSPERITY INC$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$5,000
FOSTERING CONNECTIONS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $6k → 10%FOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $5k → 18%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%THE AIDAN PROJECT: $10k → 15%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $5k → 10%THE AIDAN PROJECT: $8k → 15%THE AIDAN PROJECT: $5k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $5k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $5k → 15%EPEC INC - THE GROOMING PROJECT: $3k → 15%THE AIDAN PROJECT: $3k → 15%PAWSPERITY: $3k → 15%HAPPY BOTTOMS: $5k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $20k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $20k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $20k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$869k · 20 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$869k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-10%

Still filing today

75%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $145k · revenue +67%
  • TH
    TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $141k · revenue +29%
  • CK
    CULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • KE
    KU ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
2
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
3
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
6
Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc

To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Association of Community Action Programs Inc

Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.

Public Benefit
8
Kansas City Community Land Trust

Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.

Housing & Shelter
9
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
10
Kansas Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…

Housing & Shelter
11
Kc Common Good Inc

Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.

Employment
12
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity of Kansas City; the most unlike its peers is Shook Hardy & Bacon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $141,000 · OtherTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYKU ENDOWMENT: $50,000 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTINCLUSION CONNECTIONS PAWSABILITIES: $40,000 · OtherINCLUSION CONNECTIONS PAWSABILITIESMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KS: $28,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KSGRADYS KIDS INC: $24,500 · OtherGRADYS KIDS INCTantillo Adaptive Sailing Foundation: $16,000 · OtherSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $15,000 · OtherRECONCILIATION SERVICES - THELMA'S KITCHEN: $15,000 · Other+15 more: $57,800 · Other+15 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY: $145,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSA…COMMUNITY LINC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY LINCRECONCILIATION SERVICES: $80,000 · Human ServicesRECONCILIATION S…THE AIDAN PROJECT: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE AIDAN PROJEC…KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesKSDS ASSISTANCE …PAWSPERITY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPAWSPERITY INCHAPPYBOTTOMS: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $5,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC: $80,000 · InternationalJUNIOR AC…CULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC: $46,700 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $550 · Food & NutritionVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $30,000 · Public BenefitBAND OF ANGELS CORP: $17,250 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$387,300Housing & Shelter$255,000Human Services$145,500International$80,000Food & Nutrition$72,250Public Benefit$30,000Arts & Culture$22,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY: $145,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $141,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $110,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRECONCILIATION SERVICES: $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC: $46,700 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AIDAN PROJECT: $25,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetBAND OF ANGELS CORP: $17,250 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTantillo Adaptive Sailing Foundation: $16,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $15,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Whole Person Inc: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOOK HARDY & BACON FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LINC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILIATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATE KANSAS CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE AIDAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BAND OF ANGELS CORP ↗
  • Who funds Tantillo Adaptive Sailing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAPPYBOTTOMS ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Whole Person Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHOOK HARDY & BACON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO29.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Nichols Company Charitable Trust · Greater Horizons

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tantillo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tantillo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tantillo Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tantillo Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tantillo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph