· Public charity
Tales of the Cocktail Foundation Inc
Tales of the cocktail foundation is a non-profit organization that educates, advances, and supports the global hospitality industry and creates lasting impact in host communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $44,078 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $225,613 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $181,535 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIU FOUNDATION INC | $32,400 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF NEW OR | $11,678 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFIU FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $82k
- TTTurning Tables2× · 2021–2023 · $53k · revenue +290%
- COCHILDREN OF RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES LTD2× · 2018–2019 · $32k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- HLHISTORIC LOCUST GROVE INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -4%
- LKLIBERTY'S KITCHEN INCone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -44%
- TGTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hot bread kitchen creates economic opportunity through culinary job skills training and placement, food entrepreneurship, and an ecosystem of support for individuals who face barriers to meaningful careers.
The greater new orleans hotel & lodging association hospitality education foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing hospitality education in the greater new orleans area. the foundations mission is to…
Hospitality industry trade association
March 14, 2020, The Level Up Campaign exercised true heroism by launching the ongoing Crisis program, an initiative created to aid and assist individuals affected during national emergency disasters.The Level Up Campaign mission is to…
Support staff is a community of hospitality professionals collaborating with mental health professionals and community organizers to break down the stigmas of mental health and advocate for the well being of community members while also…
Dedicated to empowering food on entrepreneurs on their journey to scale by building bridges to education, collaboration, and capital.
The north carolina restaurant & lodging association is a philanthropic organization that supports the north carolina hospitality industry's service to the public through education, community service, community engagement, and promotion of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Liberty's Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Turning Tables. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Turning Tables ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES LTD ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC LOCUST GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY'S KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ANOTHER ROUND ANOTHER RALLY ↗
- Who funds NOAIDS TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds MADE IN NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tales of the Cocktail Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tales of the Cocktail Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Tales of the Cocktail Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.