· Private foundation
Talbott Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUND INC | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| POTTSBORO KIDS CLUB | $10,000 |
| TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION | $10,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY | $10,000 |
| EMBRACE GRACE INC | $5,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,000 |
| FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH | $5,000 |
| MASTERKEY MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF GRAYSON COUNTY | $5,000 |
| ANCHOR VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| RISE AGAIN OUTREACH | $5,000 |
| MERCY SHIPS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +28%
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +150%
- EGEmbrace Grace Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +337%
Funded once
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FDone grant, 2017 · $20k
- PFPVES FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The first presyterian church of bryan foundation, inc. provides support to the first presbyterian church of bryan for their benevolent and charitable undertakings.
To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.
Give hands on experiences to college age students who aspire to the ministry
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
The foundation supports the ministries, programs, and activities of Trinity Episcopal Church of Fort Worth.
As a steward of god's blessings and resources in the community, grace demonstrates compassion for those less fortunate by providing assistance to individuals and families in crisis and guidance toward self-sufficiency.
Christian world-wide missions and ministries to see lives changed by the power and truth of Gods Word.
Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.
A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.
Gospel mission
Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pottsboro Kids Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Pottsboro Kids Club ↗
- Who funds Embrace Grace Inc ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships Foundation ↗
- Who funds PVES FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Talbott Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.