Skip to content
Tag Treatment Action Group Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tag Treatment Action Group Inc

Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and hepatitis c virus (hcv).tag catalyzes open collective action by affected communities, scientists, and…

$686k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$885kYouth Development$73kHuman Services$55kCivil Rights$25k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $8,308, the rows itemized in this filing. The $686,417 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $678,109 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,308
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL TB CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION$8,308
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ACT UP: $10k → 17%ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $25k → 14%ACT UP: $30k → 17%ACT UP NEW YORK INC: $23k → 17%ACT UP: $15k → 17%ACT UP NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%ACT UP NEW YORK INC: $10k → 17%ACT UP NEW YORK INC: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $678k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $655k to organizations and $23k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$357k · 53% · 12 grants · 14 people

Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY · HCV LAT CAB SUPPORT/ CONSULTANCY

South Asia$195k · 29% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$127k · 19% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY/CAB SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$838k · 4 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$838k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+63%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PREP4ALL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $610k · revenue ×35
  • P
    PREP4ALL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $106k
  • AU
    ACT UP THE AIDS COALITION TO UNLEASH POWER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $106k

Funded once

  • PT
    Partnership to End AIDS Status Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +118%
  • SL
    SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • AA
    AFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Afro Pride Federation Inc

Afro Pride fosters the mental and social wellness of the Afrocentric LGBTQ community and those who love and support them.

Human Services
2
Coalition for Hiv Awareness and Prevention Inc

The Coalition for HIV Awareness and Prevention,Inc.CHAP mission is to educate the public about the nature, prevention, treatment, and impact of HIV/AIDS. Coordinate efforts of public and private resources. Discover unmet needs of those…

Health
3
People of Color Against Aids Network

The mission of POCAAN is to work with communities of color and other minority communities to advocate and ensure access to HIV/AIDS education, prevention programs support and health care resources for people of color.

Health
4
3 Kings Project

3 Kings Project is at the forefront of driving positive representation and visibility in minority communities, with a mission to eradicate health inequities impacting Black and Brown LGBTQ populations.

Civil Rights
5
Global Black Gay Men Connect Corporation

To build an activist movement of Black Gay Men that is financially sustainable and equipped to provide equal access to health care education and opportunities for economic prosperity and talent recognition Our Movement affirms the human…

Human Services
6
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
7
Tag Treatment Action Group Inc

Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and…

Unclassified
8
The Aids Institute Inc

The mission of The AIDS Institute is to promote action for social change through public policy, research, advocacy, and education.

Unclassified
9
Unaids-Usa

To support and advance efforts to address the global AIDS epidemic, in particular the efforts of the Joint United Nations Program on HIV.AIDS and its partners to: Provide leadership in achieving universal access to HIV prevention,…

—
10
Adap Advocacy Association

The ADAP Advocacy Association is a national 501c3 nonprofit organization incorporated in the District of Columbia to promote and enhance the AIDS Drug Assistance Programs ADAPs and improve access to care for persons living with HIV AIDS.

Health
11
Georgia Aids Coalition Inc

Georgia Aids Coalition is a 501c3, not for profit corporation created in 1989 as an advocate and educational resource for the formation and articulation of public policy regarding HIV/AIDS. GAC is dedicated to ensuring ethical decision…

—
12
Asociacion Puertoriquena De Servicio Y Ayuda Al Paciente Con Sida

To help to improvement of the quality of life of persons living with the VIH/SIDA, his relatives and significant persons across the coordination of critical, social and alternative

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PREP4ALL Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abounding Prosperity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREP4ALL INC: $609,508 · EducationPREP4ALL INCPartnership to End AIDS Status Inc: $50,000 · EducationPartnership to End AIDS Status IncPREP4ALL: $106,222 · OtherPREP4ALLSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN LOUI…ACT UP THE AIDS COALITION TO UNLEASH POWER: $105,850 · Human ServicesACT UP THE AID…ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesABOUNDING PROS…AFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE: $50,000 · HealthNATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS COALITION OF AMERICA INC: $16,551 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $25,000 · Civil Rights
Education$659,508Other$156,222Human Services$130,850Health$66,551Civil Rights$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACT UP THE AIDS COALITION TO UNLEASH POWER: $105,850 over 7y, 23% of budgetPartnership to End AIDS Status Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS COALITION OF AMERICA INC: $16,551 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

AIDS United
AIDS UnitedDC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AIDS United

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tag Treatment Action Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tag Treatment Action Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tag Treatment Action Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home