· Public charity
Tag Treatment Action Group Inc
Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and hepatitis c virus (hcv).tag catalyzes open collective action by affected communities, scientists, and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $8,308 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $686,417 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $678,109 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL TB CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION | $8,308 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $678k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $655k to organizations and $23k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY · HCV LAT CAB SUPPORT/ CONSULTANCY
Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY
Stated purpose: TB ADVOCACY/CAB SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PIPREP4ALL INC2× · 2020–2021 · $610k · revenue ×35
- PPREP4ALL2× · 2018–2019 · $106k
- AUACT UP THE AIDS COALITION TO UNLEASH POWER7× · 2017–2023 · $106k
Funded once
- PTPartnership to End AIDS Status Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +118%
- SLSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +63%
- AAAFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Afro Pride fosters the mental and social wellness of the Afrocentric LGBTQ community and those who love and support them.
The Coalition for HIV Awareness and Prevention,Inc.CHAP mission is to educate the public about the nature, prevention, treatment, and impact of HIV/AIDS. Coordinate efforts of public and private resources. Discover unmet needs of those…
The mission of POCAAN is to work with communities of color and other minority communities to advocate and ensure access to HIV/AIDS education, prevention programs support and health care resources for people of color.
The mission of The AIDS Institute is to promote action for social change through public policy, research, advocacy, and education.
3 Kings Project is at the forefront of driving positive representation and visibility in minority communities, with a mission to eradicate health inequities impacting Black and Brown LGBTQ populations.
The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…
Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and…
The ADAP Advocacy Association is a national 501c3 nonprofit organization incorporated in the District of Columbia to promote and enhance the AIDS Drug Assistance Programs ADAPs and improve access to care for persons living with HIV AIDS.
To support and advance efforts to address the global AIDS epidemic, in particular the efforts of the Joint United Nations Program on HIV.AIDS and its partners to: Provide leadership in achieving universal access to HIV prevention,…
Georgia Aids Coalition is a 501c3, not for profit corporation created in 1989 as an advocate and educational resource for the formation and articulation of public policy regarding HIV/AIDS. GAC is dedicated to ensuring ethical decision…
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
To help to improvement of the quality of life of persons living with the VIH/SIDA, his relatives and significant persons across the coordination of critical, social and alternative
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PREP4ALL Inc and the most unlike its peers is Abounding Prosperity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREP4ALL INC ↗
- Who funds ACT UP THE AIDS COALITION TO UNLEASH POWER ↗
- Who funds Partnership to End AIDS Status Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIN COALITION ↗
- Who funds ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TUBERCULOSIS COALITION OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: AIDS United
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tag Treatment Action Group Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.