Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ta Loving Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $143k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE$27,000
ECU HEALTH FOUNDATION$27,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$27,000
3HC HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE$27,000
BE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION$20,000
FOUR DAY MOVEMENT$15,000
COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN$7,500
WATCH$5,080
WAYNE PREGNANCY CENTER$5,000
UNITED WAY OF WAYNE COUNTY$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE$2,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE: $27k → 18%FOUR DAY MOVEMENT: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

4
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
5
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
6
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
7
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.

Human Services
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
12
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home Health and Hospice Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
0/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE CARE INC — $27,000 · HealthHOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE CARE INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $27,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCWAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $5,000 · HealthWAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INCECU HEALTH FOUNDATION — $27,000 · OtherECU HEALTH FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN — $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOUP KITCHENWATCH — $5,080 · OtherWATCHTHE SALVATION ARMY — $5,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity — $5,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt H…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $2,500 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE — $27,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN CANCER CAREFour Day Movement Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesFour Day Movement IncBE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBE LOUD SOPH…UNITED WAY OF WAYNE COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$59,000Other$52,080Human Services$42,000Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE — $27,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetHOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE CARE INC — $27,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFour Day Movement Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WAYNE COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ta Loving Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph