Skip to content

North Carolina · Private foundation

Ta Loving Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$540k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
20
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$23,200
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$4.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($279k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ta Loving Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPitt Community College Foundation Inc: $52,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $50,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheastern Cancer Care: $50,200 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetFour Day Movement Inc: $48,333 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHome Health and Hospice Care Inc: $47,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBe Loud Sophie Foundation: $43,200 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetEast Carolina University Foundation Inc: $28,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Wayne County Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWayne Pregnancy Care Center Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe V Foundation: $23,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Triangle: $10,833 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEastern Carolina Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ta Loving Foundation with peer funders

About Ta Loving Foundation

How much does Ta Loving Foundation give?
Ta Loving Foundation reported 20 grants totaling $539,749 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Ta Loving Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (75%), Human Services (13%), Food & Nutrition (4%).
Who are Ta Loving Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Pitt Community College Foundation Inc ($52k), American Cancer Society Inc ($50k), Southeastern Cancer Care ($50k).
Does Ta Loving Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ta Loving Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include North Carolina Community Foundation, Duke Energy Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Ta Loving Foundation based?
Ta Loving Foundation is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ta Loving’s filings →

More from the funding graph