Skip to content

· Private foundation

T Kevin McNicholas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$209kRecreation & Sports$169kCommunity Improvement$80kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$368k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW$52,500
MIAZS$10,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$10,000
COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION$10,000
ST MARY ACADEMY$6,500
IAAPA FOUNDATION$5,000
ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HERCULES RUN REBELS: $4k → 9%CSUMB: $5k → 12%IAAPA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $5k → 15%GREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATION: $21k → 7%HOLY FAMILY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 5%DENVER AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $10k → 7%ST MARY ACADEMY: $13k → 8%BISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 12%MIAZS: $10k → 6%CAL STATE MONTEREY BAY: $5k → 12%IAAPA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $5k → 15%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5k → 7%ST MARY ACADEMY: $7k → 8%BISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 12%BENEDICTINE COLLEGE: $5k → 15%ST MARY ACADEMY: $7k → 8%BISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 12%ST MARYS ACADAMY: $5k → 8%BISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 12%ACCELERATED SCHOOL: $9k → 12%REGIS HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $53k → 12%ASPEN ACADEMY: $10k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $45k → 12%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $20k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $40k → 12%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $20k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $23k → 12%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $15k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $11k → 12%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $10k → 8%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $10k → 12%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $10k → 12%NATIONAL WESTERN STOCK SHOW: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCATION: $10k → 12%ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE: $4k → 12%ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE: $4k → 12%ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$469k · 10 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$469k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+38%

Still filing today

40%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $201k · revenue +116%
  • CR
    COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +66%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • GV
    GREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $21k · revenue +41% · 41% of their budget
  • DA
    DENVER AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • AA
    ASPEN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $90,000 · OtherCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $65,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPEBISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL INC: $36,367 · OtherBISHOP MACHEBEUF HIGH SCHOOL INCST MARY ACADEMY: $26,000 · OtherST MARY ACADEMYGREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATION: $20,613 · OtherGREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATIONESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $12,000 · Other+13 more: $83,333 · Other+13 moreTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $200,764 · Recreation & SportsTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATIONBenedictine College: $15,000 · EducationIAAPA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF DENVER: $9,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $2,500 · Education
Other$333,313Recreation & Sports$200,764Education$36,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $200,764 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $90,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATION: $20,613 over 1y, 41% of budgetBenedictine College: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIAAPA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF DENVER: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREEN VALLEY GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds IAAPA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization T Kevin McNicholas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from T Kevin McNicholas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on T Kevin McNicholas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph