How much did T GARY AND KATHLEEN ROGERS SUPPORTING grant in FY2019?

Education$3.4MPhilanthropy$2.3MHealth$150kArts & Culture$71kCommunity Improvement$45kAnimals$30kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$558k

02FY2019 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k7 grants · $120k
$50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$250k+3 grants · $2.9M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,896,485
LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL$713,900
GO PUBLIC SCHOOLS$300,000
THE HOOVER INSTITUTION$105,000
OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND$25,100
OAKLAND SOL$25,000
AURUM PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC$25,000
BIG PICTURE LEARNING$12,500
GREAT SCHOOL CHOICES$12,000
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$10,000
ONEGOAL$10,000
ENVISION EDUCATION INC$8,350

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 96% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.8M · 7 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.8M

$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+45%

Still filing today

100%

81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyAnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LC
LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
2× · 2018–2019 · $1.4M · revenue +158%
THE HOOVER INSTITUTION
2× · 2018–2019 · $210k · revenue +32%
EE
ENVISION EDUCATION INC
2× · 2018–2019 · $78k · revenue +40%

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $355k · revenue +81%
US
UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $350k · revenue +91%
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +384%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Innovate Public Schools

Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.

Philanthropy

Elite Public Schools

The organization's mission is to ensure all students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning…

Education

Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education

Kipp Bay Area Schools

Kipp bay area schools prepares students with skills and confidence for their future.

Education

Alliance College-Ready Public

Dedicated to strengthening the community support and investment of our schools and scholars.

Education

The California Education Partners

Supporting learning and collaboration between california's school districts and their partners to improve student success.

Education

Leadership Public Schools

To operate public charter schools in california.

Education

The Language Academy of Sacramento

To prepare k-8th grade students to excel academically in spanish & english.

Education

Alternative Schools Inc

A charter school helping each child reach his/her fullest potential.

Education

Partnership for Los Angeles Schools

Transform schools to revolutionize school systems to empower all students with a high-quality education.

Education

Association of California School

Promote the advancement of education.

—

The Berkeley School

A preschool-8th grade independent school whose mission is to ignite curious minds, awaken generous hearts, and engage a changing world.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Pioneers and the most unlike its peers is The Michael J Fox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/44

the rest of the field

12%

22,289/186,934

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/39

Grantees still filing

31/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$3,376,489Philanthropy$2,298,485Other$585,620Health$150,000Arts & Culture$71,465Community Improvement$45,000Animals$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Gary and Kathleen Rogers PrivateCA33.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private · East Bay Community Foundation · Lead Liberated · Silicon Schools Fund Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · The Oakland Public Education Fund · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Golden State Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Quest Foundation · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation T GARY AND KATHLEEN ROGERS SUPPORTING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OAKLAND LITERACY COALITION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 12.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812901834 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OAKLAND LITERACY COALITION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting?

Find your warmest path to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

T GARY AND KATHLEEN ROGERS SUPPORTING

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting?

More from the funding graph

T GARY AND KATHLEEN ROGERS SUPPORTING

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting?

More from the funding graph