How much did SWIFT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of SWIFT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

education sarasotaliteracy higlands

2019

church palms

2020

—

2021

learning

2022

middle

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,150

Median grant

States reached

$185k

Total assets

Largest grants

PHILLIPPI SHORES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$7,750
SELAH FREEDOM INC$7,500
MARTIN LIPSCOMB PERFORMING ARTS CEN$7,000
CHILD PROTECTION CENTER$6,106
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDH$6,106
SHERIFFS ATHLETIC LEAGUE$5,605
ROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLANDS$5,500
EMMA E BOOKER$5,200
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
HIGHLANDS UNITED METHODIST CHURC$5,000
TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF SARASOTA$4,605
TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC$4,005
BISHOP WATTERSON HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$4,000
FLORIDA SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCH$4,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 8% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.1M · 70 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

70 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+244%

Still filing today

26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CHILD PROTECTION CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +84%
TEEN COURT OF SARASOTA INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +174%
SECOND CHANCE LAST OPPORTUNITY
8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +1369%

Funded once

TO
TOWN OF HIGHLANDS
one grant, 2017 · $11k
HS
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL
one grant, 2018 · $7k
ES
EASTER SEALS
one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sarasota City Foundation Inc

Philanthropy

Sarasota Police Foundation Inc

To improve public safety in the city of sarasota, florida, by providing resources and support to the sarasota city police department that are not readily available through other means.

Crime & Legal

Suncoast Charities for Children Inc

Suncoast charities for children is a 501(c)(3) that provides direct financial support to several local non-profit agencies offering programs and services to children, teens, and adults with special needs. it also provides funding to the…

Housing & Shelter

Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation, inc. is an independent fundraising organization working with sarasota memorial health care system and others to ensure the highest quality healthcare is accessible and meets the needs of our…

Health

Sarasota Kiwanis Foundation Inc

To support such worthy projects for youth and the elderly as in the opinion of the trustees shall be deserving of such assistance.

Community Improvement

University of South Florida Foundation Inc

To accept, invest and distribute private gifts in support of the university of south florida.

Education

Girls Incorporated

Girls inc. of sarasota county serves girls ages 5-24, inspiring them to be strong,smart, and bold by providing research-based programming, trusted mentors,and real-world opportunities. see sch o for complete mission stmt.

Youth Development

The South Florida Charity Classic

Human Services

Education Foundation of Sarasota County

To enhance the potential of students, promote excellence in teaching,and inspire innovation in education, guided by strategic philanthropy.

Education

The Saluda Charitable Foundation

International

Suncoast Workforce Board Inc

The organization's mission is to identify and invest in workforce development solutions to meet the needs of manatee and sarasota counties.

Employment

The Rotary Club of Boca Raton West Foundation Corp

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Court of Sarasota Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/34

the rest of the field

12%

534/4,413

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

28/29

Grantees still filing

22/29

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$966,532Youth Development$56,915Crime & Legal$52,246Human Services$44,000Philanthropy$28,115Education$27,610Religion$17,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota CoFL42.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Joan Armour Mendell Foundation Inc · Tarr Charitable Family Foundation Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · Annette J Hagens Memorial Foundation · The Cowles Charitable Trust · Harry Sudakoff Foundation Inc · Theda Bohrer Wendy and Tracey Shapiro · The Community Foundation Trust Of

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SWIFT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~15 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 596153330 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROTARY CLUB OF SARASOTA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Swift Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Swift Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SWIFT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Swift Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

SWIFT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Swift Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph