Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

SVMC Holdings Inc

To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.

$651k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$423k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of SVMC Holdings Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $423k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$373M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southwest Community Health Center Inc$422,742
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc$100,000
The RiseUP Group Inc$25,593
Bridgeport Regional Business Council$20,000
Lifebridge Community Services Inc$20,000
Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc$20,000
nOURish Bridgeport Inc$20,000
Bridgeport Caribe Youth Leaders Inc$7,500
Connecticut Institute for Refugees & Immigrants$7,500
Make The Road States Inc dba Make the Road CT$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 74% of SVMC Holdings Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

SVMC Holdings Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 5 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-14%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +52%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • PC
    PARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +20%
  • FR
    Faith Restoration Empowerment & Economic Dev Outresearch Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TD
    THE DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Connecticut Project Inc

The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.

Community Improvement
2
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
3
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
4
Connecticut Association for Community Action Inc

The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.

5
Connecticut Council for Philanthropy

Ccp organizes, inspires, and equips a community of funders to learn, collaborate, and lead together for sustained impact and social change in connecticut.

Philanthropy
6
Central Ct Chambers of Commerce Incorporated

Business working together to promote regional prosperity and community vitality.

7
Connecticut Business and Industry Association Inc

CBIA is the voice of business in Connecticut, with thousands of member companies championing change at the State Capitol, shaping debate about economic competitiveness and fighting for a better future for all.

8
Connstep Inc

To help connecticut manufacturers apply advanced manufacturing and management techniques to become more competitive, supporting the growth of connecticut economy.

Community Improvement
9
Connecticut Citizen Action Group Inc

We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.

10
The Bridge Academy Inc

The bridge academy, inc. was granted a charter to operate the bridge academy, a public school located in the city of bridgeport, ct. the school was founded in 1997 to provide college preparatory curriculum designed to overcome the…

Education
11
Connecticut Roundtable On Climate and Jobs

CRCJ seeks to build a worker-oriented environmental movement committed to securing a fair and just transition that protects not only the environment but also the livelihoods of workers and their communities.

Environment
12
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Park City Initiative Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $2,052,679 · OtherSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC+8 more — $127,500 · Other+8 morePARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATION — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTICUT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYINC — $49,430 · AnimalsLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesMake The Road States Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesThe Riseup Group Inc — $25,593 · EducationMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC — $25,000 · HealthNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC — $20,000 · Religion
Other$2,380,179Housing & Shelter$50,000Animals$49,430Human Services$27,500Education$25,593Health$25,000Religion$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $2,052,679 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYINC — $49,430 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBRIDGEPORT REGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL — $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetThe Riseup Group Inc — $25,593 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTOYS FOR HOSPITAL TOTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBRIDGEPORT CARIBE YOUTH LEADERS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMake The Road States Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Elizabeth M Pfriem Foundation · The Bridgeport Rotary Club Foundation Inc · Tauck Family Foundation · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization SVMC Holdings Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc37% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc32% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc19% of income from government
  • The Discovery Museum Inc15% of income from government
  • Southwest Community Health Center Inc10% of income from government
  • The Riseup Group Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph