Skip to content
SVMC Holdings Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

SVMC Holdings Inc

To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$692k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$2.3MHousing & Shelter$50kCommunity Improvement$50kAnimals$49kArts & Culture$43kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$33kYouth Development$8k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $692k
$10,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$388M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SouthWest Community Health Center Inc$691,699
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc$100,000
Catholic Charities of Fairfield County$45,000
Nourish Bridgeport Inc$22,500
Lifebridge CommunityServices Inc$20,000
The Discovery Museum Inc$17,500
St Vincent De Paul Place Norwich Inc$12,500
Project Purple Inc$10,605
Faith CD Corporation$10,500
Sacred Heart University Inc$10,500
Anti Defamation League$10,000
Health Asssistance Intervention Education$10,000
The Cancer Couch Foundation$10,000
Birdgeport Caribe Youth Leaders Inc$10,000
The Bridgeport Regional Business Council Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 74% of SVMC Holdings Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

SVMC Holdings Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 10 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$3.4M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +52%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • PC
    PARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • TR
    The Riseup Group Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue -7%
  • FR
    Faith Restoration Empowerment & Economic Dev Outresearch Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
2
Connecticut Council for Philanthropy

Ccp organizes, inspires, and equips a community of funders to learn, collaborate, and lead together for sustained impact and social change in connecticut.

Philanthropy
3
Connecticut Legal Rights Project Inc

The primary exempt purpose of ct legal rights project, inc. is to provide legal representation and advocacy for low income adults with psychiatric disabilities.

Unclassified
4
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
5
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
7
The Connecticut Project Inc

The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.

Community Improvement
8
Connecticut Catholic Public Affairs Conference Inc

The connecticut catholic public affairs conference, inc. is established by the bishops of the roman catholic dioceses, both of the latin rite and the ukrainian rite, which have their see cities in connecticut, to provide positions…

Religion
9
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
10
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
11
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
12
Connecticut Foodshare Inc

The mission of the connecticut foodshare is to deliver an informed and equitable response to hunger by mobilizing community partners, volunteers, and supporters.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Faith Cd Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
8/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,744,378 · OtherSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC+11 more: $238,500 · Other+11 moreLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFaith CD Corporation: $10,500 · Human ServicesMake The Road States Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesPARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $25,000 · HealthPROJECT PURPLE INC: $10,605 · HealthHEALTH ASSISTANCE INTERVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK FOR CT HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE CANCER COUCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYINC: $49,430 · AnimalsNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $42,500 · ReligionThe Riseup Group Inc: $25,593 · EducationSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $10,500 · Education
Other$3,282,878Human Services$58,000Housing & Shelter$57,500Health$55,605Animals$49,430Religion$42,500Education$36,093

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,744,378 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARK CITY INITIATIVE CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYINC: $49,430 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $42,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBRIDGEPORT REGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL: $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Riseup Group Inc: $25,593 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGEPORT CARIBE YOUTH LEADERS INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE NORWICH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH ASSISTANCE INTERVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK FOR CT HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOYS FOR HOSPITAL TOTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMake The Road States Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Co…The Near and Far Asso…Elizabeth M Pfriem Fo…The Bridgeport Rotary…Tauck Family Foundati…The Scripps Family Fu…The Pitney Bowes Foun…William Caspar Graust…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Elizabeth M Pfriem Foundation · The Bridgeport Rotary Club Foundation Inc · Tauck Family Foundation · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SVMC Holdings Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SVMC Holdings Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Community Services Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc: 19% of income from government
  • The Discovery Museum Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Southwest Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Riseup Group Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on SVMC Holdings’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home